Archive for October, 2007

Sintex acquires Nief Plastic for 31 million euros

No Comments » Written on October 31st, 2007 by
Categories: Stocks
Sintex Industries has acquired Nief Plastics, a French Plastics manufacturer. This changes things for Sintex substantially, as it gives them a much needed European presence and brings them new injection moulding technology for the Indian markets as well.

The deal's at 30.9 million euros, for a 100% equity stake. The deal also makes Sintex absord the 11 million euro debt that the company has, meaning the net investment is around 42 million euros (the loan has to be paid back!)

Nief makes stuff for a lot of very famous European brands, like Thryssenkrupp, Areva, Alstom, Renault etc. Not just that, Nief has manufacturing facilities in Eastern Europe and Africa, giving Sintex the ability to deliver faster in these markets.

Nief makes about 110 million euros in revenues, and EBIDTA is about 10-15 million euros. They must make about 7-10 million euros post interest and tax, making the deal about 5-6 P/E, which is reasonable.

Where's the money coming from? 31 million euros is about 160 cr. which they can easily finance; their March 07 Cash flow statement shows over 574 cr. in cash. This is great, because a) they don't need to take on debt for this acquisition and b) they can use the surplus cash.

You usually take P/E to value a company, and that is entirely based on earnings. Cash in the bank does not yield much in terms of earnings so that is usually not accounted for; when a company uses its cash to expand the business, it can yield much more than an equivalent bank deposit yield. In this case, let's assume Nief makes 7 million euros in net profit = about 35 crores. (this is post tax, interest and all that) So Sintex has effectively invested 160 cr. of its cash, to get 35 cr. return per year, which is a 20%+ return, much more than it would have got for the money had it sat in a bank account or debt mutual fund.

The impact on financials: Sintex should make around 160 cr. this year, EPS being around the 14 Rs. mark. An additional 35 crores will bump up EPS by about Rs. 3 (maybe not fully this year but still), and in toto the EPS should be around 17 - not accounting for a very small Bright Brothers acquisition earlier this year. Even for an EPS of 15 the growth is around 40%, and with the current price is around Rs. 460 the P/E is around 30. Synergies will increase earnings, and I believe the stock will go up.

Disclosure: They announced this as an "impending acquisition" when they announced their results two weeks back and I bought some of their shares at Rs. 370. It's now 460, and I purchased some more when they announced the acquisition yesterday, at 445. I am long on this stock. Also, this is not a recommendation to buy or a solicitation for this stock; this is only my opinion.

So it’s now 20,000, is it a big deal?

7 comments Written on October 29th, 2007 by
Categories: Commentary
We're now at 20,000 on the Sensex and nearly 6000 on the Nifty. Who'd have thunk this a couple years ago? Everyone is celebrating - The TV channels have gone berserk, as they would be expected to, and Mukesh Ambani is the richest man in the world.

First reaction: Goodness this is crazy, is this irrational exuberance? Second reaction: Big deal. This as always been exuberance, as I've been rattling on for the last two months. We may have a lot more to go, we may end up dead tomorrow, who knows? I'm on the "enjoy the ride" sequence.

90% of the last 1000 points were in just 6 stocks - L&T, ICICI Bank, Reliance being the real meat of the move. Yet, are we overvalued?

This is results season, and results are excellent. BHEL is up 91% on profits, HDFC up 75%, L&T up 73%, Suzlon up nearly 1000% and so on. I could go on for a bit but it seems like the fundamentals are mindblowing! This is fantastic stuff, Corporate India. These results tell me how much we can grow in real terms, and that eventually this kind of growth can help us build India. Note: This has nothing to do with stock markets - earnings growth may not be reflected in stock prices, and vice versa. In fact the past is testament to how markets have either overvalued or undervaled the economy. But strong sustained earnings growth makes to a good long term story, according to me.

Another interesting development is that FIIs were net buyers on Monday - they put in 680 cr. in NSE Cash and over 2000 cr. in derivatives. Plus, mutual funds have been buying for the last week or so, but small amounts - around 500-600 cr. per day. This is also quite good, and when domestic institution investment levels go crazy maybe there will be some cause for concern.

There is still a lot of caution in the markets, so I'm confident we'll go up from here. It's when we're all euphoric is when it will come crashing down. I'm now not just invested but also leveraged and in - of course it's money I can afford to lose so I'm ok losing a significant part of it too. Up over 45% now and going strong.

This now is going to get philosophical. My son's taken to ghazals. He only sleeps when I play Jagjit Singh's numbers, so I've been listening to a lot of them lately. So it struck a chord with me when I realised how some investors have completely missed this rally, calling the markets "overpriced" when it was 4500 Nifty/16,000 Sensex. How some stocks which were "hot" were labelled irrational and investors refused to buy them. How some commenters here were actually angry that their stocks had not even moved while the market scaled new highs. Sometimes, you miss things because you're too focussed on "value". In a Jagjit Singh number, quite aptly put:

Hoshwalon ko khabar kya, bekhudi kya cheez hai.
And when this all dies down - the crazy bull run, the madness to buy and sell, the insanity goes away, another number applies:
Tum chale jaaoge to sochenge,
Hum ne kya khoya, Hum ne kya paaya.
Right now, I'm just riding with the trend. Phir karenge hisaab, ae saaqii.

Disclosure: Long everything.

Bartronics: What’s cooking?

6 comments Written on October 27th, 2007 by
Categories: Stocks
A recent article by R. Balakrishnan at Money Life caught my attention. It's about Bartronics, a share I recently traded.
Against total sales of around Rs. 64 crore in the full year, the year-end debtors stand at over Rs71 crore! And the balance sheet says that debtors’ outstanding for less than six months is Rs49 crore. Interestingly, by seeking its quarterly results for the full year, I find that in the last two quarters of the year, Bartronics had notched up sales of Rs35 crore. Against total sales of Rs35 crore in six months to March 07, the company’s debtors’ outstanding for less than six months is Rs49 crore. Funny arithmetic indeed!
I have verified from the Bartronics Annual Report (2006-07) that Balakrishnan is correct - they do have these numbers in their annual report. Simply put: They have said they "sold" 64 crores worth of goods, and the need to still receive 71 crores from their customers. More than a year's turnover as receivable! That's reeks of either government contracts (which Bartronics has) or something funny. No wonder operating cash flow is negative!

Balakrishnan perhaps saw a misprint because the capital allocation is quite clear in the link above. There are 8 lakh stock options, 46 lakh promoter warrants (at 130) and 32.5 lakh institutional warrants (at 110). A total of 87 lakh shares will be added to the current 1.78 crore, meaning real outstanding shares are considered to be 2.65 crore (or will be as of Dec 2008). That brings the EPS for the FY down to 5.54.

One other problem: They mention that they didn't spend anything on R&D in the year, but also admit that they must do research in order to be competitive. Uhm.

The stock's done well, and it's been some fantastic momentum. I think management should answer these questions (I will mail them myself) - if not, this is a bubble stock. To its credit, there is a new smart card facility coming up. And the first Q 2007 results have been very good, up nearly 100% year on year. So while it doesn't look overvalued to me, it's not exactly cheap either.

But be careful, if you own this share. The financials don't quite seem to add up.

ESOP FBT Clarification

13 comments Written on October 27th, 2007 by
Categories: Commentary
Notification on ESOP FBT :
  • Fair market value of the stock option is the value of hte share on the date of vesting, if the stock is listed on an Indian exchange. (Average of Open and Close price).
  • If it's unlisted or listed in other exchanges (non Indian) the value must be determined by a "Category 1" merchant banker (registered with SEBI). Such merchant bankers are fairly big, and I think would now charge extremehly high fees for valuation.
  • Companies need to pay 33.99% of the difference between the fair market value and the grant price, and this FBT applies on the day of VESTING, not exercise.
  • I don't know what happens to foreign listed companies, like Genpact, Rediff etc. whose employees get options in India. They'll probably need a Cat 1 Merchant banker assessing them every six monts or so.
  • I also don't know what happens if you don't exercise on vesting - I'm assuming the company still needs to pay the tax, so they'll soon find ways to get it from you.
  • This valuation clarification is only valid from Assessment Year starting 1st April 2008, meaning (thanks to commenter Pronto) that it has been valid since April 2007 for FY 07-08. Assessment years are the year after the actual financial year.
  • There's still a lot of confusion, but this is very bad for unlisted startups, who now need to get themselves assessed every 6 months by a category 1 merchant banker, whose fees I would imagine are quite high. This is pure stupidity and spells the death knell for option grants as we know it.
  • I think innovative "structured" products will start appearing with third party entities holding stock and transferring them to the employee when required etc. This can be done using trusts, and I think we'll go back to that era again.


Trading: Up 40% since Aug 30.

10 comments Written on October 27th, 2007 by
Categories: TradingUpdate
Trading updates: I'm up nearly 40% since I started (versus Index gain of 27%). A lot of changes to the portfolio this week.

On cash stocks, I had sold Jai Corp at 1278 as it showed signs of weakness...I bought nearly all of it back today as it showed strength again. I also bought L&T (at 3335) and Reliance Capital (at 1745). Today I added HOV Services - a stock that is unbelievable but seems to have been overlooked by everyone - at 205. A result arbitrage trade in Voltas didn't quite work out, so closed it at a small loss. Closed positions: IGate, as I decided it wasn't quite showing the momentum I wanted. Bought at 338, sold at 355 within two weeks.

F&O: Expiry was on Thursday and I sold out the 5100 puts as the Index neared 5200 as there was very little time left to expiry and these options were expensive. I owned some 5700 calls which obviously didn't make the grade, but they were high risk and low cost anyhow. A number of Nifty future trades, based on momentum based directional calls, yielded nearly 20% on the investment this week. I took a loss in the Suzlon future the day before its results and I was totally unaware that the next day was results day! Had I stuck on, I would have made over 60% on that investment in a day - lesson learnt: don't exit a stock before you check its event calendar.

Small losses also in NIIT Tech (waited for results and then the market didn't like 'em), India Cements (another ridiculous intraday play - note to self: don't play the intraday game, it doesn't work for you) and in Nifty puts and calls on Expiry day (it was an attempt at a pinning strategy which didn't quite work).

I managed a result move in Satyam - results being good, I picked up the future for a three day move. The very next day the stock ended up 5% higher, and I sold - the leveraged move yielding about 4,200 per contract. I sold as it retraced actually, a trailing stop loss in a way. Some quick momentum moves in RPL as well, over two days, have yielded an F&O profit. I own the stock in cash (as a longer term purchase) but the intraday moves in RPL scare me, as it could wipe out a significant amount of my capital. So I end up taking small profits. Lesson here is: Either increase your capital or don't use these stocks on F&O, because I will not always be lucky.

What's coming out of here is certain parameters I am comfortable with, and certain others I am not. There are lessons on multiple fronts: what kind of stop losses I should have, how I should deal with massive volatility, what kind of positions are within my comfort zone and finally, what data I need to make important trading decisions. My aim is to beat the index comprehensively - right now I'm up 40% and the index is up 28% in the same time frame, and I need to be much better. What's interesting is that I did not overleverage myself, so I didn't have too much of a problem during the dip, in fact I recovered all losses the day after the dip.

Note: This is my trading update. I don't mean to recommend any of the above stocks, or even that you try anything like this. Don't do it because I do it - as I've said I can afford to lose a significant amount of the money invested.

P-Notes: A Non Issue

No Comments » Written on October 25th, 2007 by
Categories: Commentary
So the whole P-Note thing has been sorted out. (SEBI Press Release)
  • P-Notes on derivatives are out. Meaning no more participatory notes ISSUED on derivatives. But current ones can stay, and need to be phased out in 18 months. 18 months is an eternity in the stock markets, so can we please stop worrying about this as a problem.
  • P-Notes on equities and debt can continue - and that's restricted to 40% of Assets under Control (AUC). This number is not ambiguous as the TV-channels would like to make you believe; it is just the figure given by custodians. SEBI collates them in their monthly bulletins (sample) so why can't an FII do it?
  • Sub-accounts can no longer issue P-Notes, on anything. They need to be full fledged FIIs.
  • If a sub-account has applied to become an FII, they don't get restricted from the sub-account p-note closure, until their application is processed.
  • Who can become an FII? Any foreign institution that is regulated by some authority abroad, has a fund manager with more than 1 year track record, and the ability to fill out an application.
  • This affects very little going forward. Some people may complain and whine and wail; but for us lay investors this means very little.
  • One thing it may do is reduce foreign fund flows until this full fledged FII registration is complete. At the pace SEBI is going (they are planning to clear them out in a week!) this is again a non-issue.
  • If the markets tank due to this issue, it's not due to this issue, this issue is just an excuse.
  • The irrationality of the markets has not gone away, it still exists; we are at a market wide P/E of 25, which isn't bonkers but is definitely higher than we're used to seeing. If it's purely from foreign fund flows, then we'll see a correction of sorts, but if it's a re-rating of India's economy (note: China's P/E is 45+) then the P/E means little even today. Don't know which is what.
  • Again, today's P/E isn't totally reflective since results season isn't over yet.
  • I'm still betting on the momentum to go forward. I've got a wider stop loss now - 20% - but it's really starting to work now. (More on that later)

Dow down 366, Oil near $90

7 comments Written on October 19th, 2007 by
Categories: Commentary
The Dow Jones Industrial Average is down 366 points, or 2%, on Friday. This has been attributed to lower earnings, oil prices close to $90 and general recessionary concerns in the US.

Note: the media will blow this out of proportion over the next two days.

Stil, I wish to caution you that if we fall like crazy on Monday, it may be a reversal that prompts action. My suggestion: Don't do ANYTHING on Monday, if you're not a trader. Wait for the closing and then decide. Don't use stop losses intraday as life will be extremely volatile.

Just a note to say this is quite serious, but don't panic.

Reliance and RPL aren’t quite overvalued

16 comments Written on October 19th, 2007 by
Categories: Stocks
I hear a lot nowadays about how Reliance, the biggest loser on the Index, has been overvalued, had doubled for no reason etc. etc. I would like to present my view on this topic.

Reliance Industries is growing at 30-40% on EPS. It's being given a forward P/E of 25. This is not considering that it's sitting on a pile of cash, and is also growing inorganically, and has an unvalued reliance retail, a majority stake in RPL and RPL is worth 78000 cr. , building huge coke gasification and paraxylene plants of the size no one else has in the world, and of course it has all the gas finds, the SEZs and all that. Throw out all of that stuff, and we still have a growth rate of 30-40% this quarter, and forward P/E is 25.

This is one of India's largest companies by turnover. They make more revenues than Infy, TCS, Wipro, and Satyam ADDED UP, quarterly. And they have recently grown faster on profits than all of these companies.

Take this quarter. They have a P/E of 26, which is consolidated with IPCL. This is not including an unrecorded forex gain of Rs. 515 cr. (which other companies like Tata Steel and Airtel are recording) which is about Rs. 4 per diluted share. Let's just take Rs. 2 of that for this quarter. That's a total of Rs. 28 earnings per share. If you take Q2 last year and consolidate with IPCL, you get an EPS of 19 for RIL and 2.5 for IPCL (12.4 is IPCL's EPS, but divide by 5 since the merger was 5:1) That's 21.5 last year. About 33% growth on EPS. Going forward they are close to an EPS of about Rs. 100 on the year. The price is 2,500. P/E? 25.

They call that expensive? Note that we are paying Infy a P/E of 25 forward, on a growth rate of 20% and even their one year guidance is only 20% growth. They are EXPECTED to earn Rs. 79.9 (the highest end of their guidance) per share. Last year they did Rs. 67 or so. The growth rate? Less than 20%. At current price of Rs. 1900, that's a P/E of 23.

I have heard a lot of things about Reliance and the promoters. But they have created more shareholder wealth in the last five years (and earlier too but ditch that for now) than most other companies. In fact if you had bought one share of Reliance pre-brother-split in 2005, you would have paid Rs. 800 or so, and got one share of Reliance, one RNRL, one RCOM, and some parts of REL and Reliance Capital. The net value of these shares today is around Rs. 4,000, a five fold increase in less than three years.

And this is India's most valuable company, by market cap. The biggest company in India grows your money 5 fold in 3 years. Very few in the top 10 can claim to do so - closest perhaps is Airtel, and that's valued at, let's see, a p/e of 40+.

Yes, today people say RIL it's "overvalued". But have they considered that all this time, it has just been undervalued severely? They gave it a P/E of 15 when it grew at twice that rate. Today it's doubled and the P/E is still lower than its forward growth rate. And it's expensive because it's doubled in value?

I know that Reliance will participate just as much in a crash as anyone else. Yet, they are the guys you want to buy, because from here downwards, they are more valuable than most other large caps.

Let's also look a little bit at RPL, Reliance Petroleum Limited. People say it's WILDLY overvalued for a company that hasn't even started production yet.

It's coming up on schedule in Dec 2008. (Reliance has have said it's earlier than schedule, but ditch that, let's say it comes on schedule). It will process 580,000 barrels per day of heavy crude. Reliance Industries does about the same ammount, actually RIL does about 40,000 barrels a day less than RPL. But let's assume similar margins for the RPL businesses and work it out. The half yearly (net) profit of reliance on the refining segment as of Q2, 2008 was about 3859 cr. as gleaned from the quarterly report. Multiply that by 2 to get annual figures you get about 7700 cr.

Now if RPL can do exactly that, it earns an EPS of about Rs. 17.1 per share.

Now if we add the 0.9 million ton polypropylene plant in RPL, with current margins, the EPS may square off at around Rs. 20 per share.

The current value of RPL is around 170, which is pretty reasonable for what is effectively one of the world's largest refineries. Perhaps a little higher can be given for higher margins (with a stabilised dollar, margins will be higher than now) and the fact that the project is a little ahead of schedule. So it's not "over" valued, it's perhaps got to a reasonable valuation as of current market pricing. It will get re-rated as refinery margins change and heavy-light crude differential (currently $5) changes.

Hope that helps. Value is obviously a very difficult thing, but I present my simplistic view. Please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.

Disclosure: I am long RIL and RPL.