Archive for March, 2008

Hammered Down

15 comments Written on March 17th, 2008 by
Categories: Commentary
Welcome to another episode of the Indian Stock Market free falls, where every day is getting worse than earlier. With today's 6% slide down to 4500, we're at the levels when the upmove really started, in August 07.

[Actually that's when I started my trading portfolio and Jan end or so is when I finished it, with the portfolio up around 58%. I've sold nearly everything - readers will know that I've been bearish a long time now - and it looks like I was right, in hindsight.]

Now is this the bottom? Uhem. Nifty's P/E is still 19.6, which you might agree is a tad high for the current state of the world. We should be valued at sub 15 levels, which is another 20% lower than here. That is value. Today we are still hoping for momentum.

Bear Sterns, one of the largest US investment banks, nearly went bust. Last Monday the company said, "Bear Stearns' balance sheet, liquidity and capital remain strong." On Thursday the stock was around $60 per share, and on Friday it tanked to $30. Today it was bought by JP Morgan for $2 per share.

$60 to $2 in TWO DAYS. What a nightmare. Will we see such a situation? I sure hope not.

Uhm. Orchid Chemicals is down some 38% today, ICICI Bank down 13.3%, and a lot others completely beaten up. It's not a nice thing but let me say this: this is still a good enough level to get out. Not worth staying on, and there may be a rally after this to help but these are just levels to cash out. Shorting is tough at these levels, you need to look for a strong rally, preferably after this month's expiry.

Coming to investing: We will soon come to levels where "value" becomes apparent. Please don't rush in. There is a lot of latent bad news and we need to go through all of those, overreact, take it completely down until there seems to be no hope. And that is the time to invest.

Yen Rises and So Does Blood Pressure

1 Comment » Written on March 14th, 2008 by
Categories: Commentary
More "derivatives" madness is on the cards. From ET's "Rising Yen gives companies the jitters":
As the dollar slipped below Y100 for the first time since 1995, hundreds of corporates and institutions were exposed to a brutal currency market. On Thursday, the dramatic surge in yen (as well as swiss franc) activated several high-risk structures, like ‘knock-in’ options, which were lying dormant for months in corporate treasuries ...

...

...The big hits will be in cases where firms have bought knock-in structures. In derivatives, the ‘knock -in’ structure is activated when a currency gains beyond a level. Till that level, the corporate can buy it at an attractive rate.

But once the currency breaches the level agreed in the contract, the corporate has to buy it at the prevailing market rate. If the currency has surged, he has to fork out so much to meet the monthly or weekly outgos as specified in the synthetic contract.

According to a banker, several corporates had done a deal with 1$=Y100 as the knock-in level. For Swiss franc — the other currency that has shown a similar appreciation against the dollar — the knock-in level is 1Sw Fr= $1. On Thursday, the SwFr was trading at 1.0070 — a dangerously close level for the auction to be knocked in. For Euro, the knock-in levels are E1 Euro = 1.59-66, as against the spot price of 1.56.

What many companies may have done is first enter into swap — a transaction that will convert its high-interest rupee borrowing into significantly cheaper yen/Sw Franc loan. Almost simultaneously, they enter into an option contract to protect the risk on such swaps. But these knock-in structures offer only a conditional production. “Some of the global banks may push up the swiss franc to get the contracts knocked in, and in the process make corporates pay up,” said a banker.

Since many contracts will mature between April and August, and several more will get the knock-in contracts triggered in the next few days, some of the local banks are trying to ringfence themselves against difficult clients.

In short, either the corporates or the banks are screwed. No idea about extent of losses, and no idea about who the the corporates or the banks are.

When there is a downturn, all negative news comes out of the woodwork. Things that seemed like a "perfect hedge" unwind themselves in the most unpredictable way. The news may be exaggerated in some cases, like when people say "Sensex will go back to 6,000" and all that. (There is no way of predicting an outlier like that. If you're wrong no one will remember, and if you're right everyone will praise you. No risk in making a statement like that, anytime. For the record I predict that the Sensex will either hit 6,000 or 25,000 in the next fifty years. Ha.)

There is likely to be more bad news, or regular news that in these times, becomes bad news. Like they say in Bangalore, yen-jaay.

New Ratings Are Here

No Comments » Written on March 13th, 2008 by
Categories: Uncategorized
I am happy to announce two new ratings for subprime CDOs and indeed, the entire credit marketplace if the highly paid members of this society so desire.

The Supreme Highly Infallible Tranche, which as we earlier used to called "Super Senior" but whose initials failed to signify its true underlying nature, is now free to use for all CDOs based entirely or largely on subprime mortgages. Ratings agencies may find this a better name than the Absolutely Asinine Acronym that used to be bowed to.

The C'mon Realty Always aPpreciates is specifically for those in denial. I'm sure it'll make you happy.

Whoa What Just Happened?

2 comments Written on March 13th, 2008 by
Categories: Commentary
My goodness, what a bearish day! The Nifty tanked about 280 points to close at the 4600 levels, and the bottom seems to have dropped out of the market. I don't like this one bit but there are some global factors to it.

First, Carlyle Capital is going bust. From Reuters:

Carlyle Capital Corp , an affiliate of private equity firm Carlyle Group, said late on Wednesday its lenders are likely to take possession of its remaining assets after it was unable to reach a mutually beneficial agreement to stabilize its financing.
Carlyle Cap leveraged about $600 million to $20 billion or so, a 32 times leverage which is basically like playing russian roulette with a gun that has five chambers full instead of one. One of these days you're going to die.

Worse news, in the same article:

In Asia, the iTRAXX Asia ex-Japan investment grade index which is dominated by banking credits, was sold off.

It blew out by 10 basis points (bps) to 213 bps on the Carlyle news, market sources said.

From the index definition, some Indian companies (ICICI Bank, BOI, RIL, Tata Motors) are in the index. Now I don't know how it affects them, but typically debt spreads increase meaning cost of debt will go up. It means more MTM losses for those that have exposure to credit derivatives to this index.

In other news, the Yen has appreciated to 100 to a dollar. This signals the end of carry trade as we know it. Banks and Hedge funds borrow at obscenely low rates on the yen, covert to dollars and invest around the world, including India. Even ICICI bank seems to have done that. Now when they have to pay back, yen appreciation means they will get fewer yen for their dollars, and a rapid increase - like the 6 month move from 114 to 100 - just kills every profitable opportunity.

How? Because people leverage their dollars, say 10 times, and get 10x for all the money. In return they invest in instruments they can place as collateral, like bonds, MBSes, CDOs and all that. These things, in good times, give like 6-10% returns. Today it's very much negative. Even with 6%, the 14% yen appreciation results in a negative return!

With hedge funds getting calls from Mr. Margin, the credit indices for Asia also breaking down and the yen going to glory, the world credit markets are due for a fantastic collapse, coming soon to a theater near you.

What happened today, in my opinion, is that investors (some local, some FIIs) are spooked by these developments and yanking out their money when they can. Is it overdone? I don't know. My personal point is that the Nifty is really oversold only below 4000 - till then we are still over-optimistic.

I think we're in for a see-saw time. Disclosure: I have a straddle on the index today - a put and a call.

The Big Time US Bailout

6 comments Written on March 12th, 2008 by
Categories: Commentary
The US Fed just decided to infuse the market with liquidity of nearly $200 billion, by accepting as collateral, mortgage backed securities (MBS). This is a "Term Securities Lending Facility", which is currently for a period of 28 days from March 27.

What does this mean?

First, this is not the US govt. buying the securities. No. It's lending on the BASIS of these securities for 28 days, and the risk and recoverability is still the responsibility of the owner.

Second, this puts new money in the hands of people who own these mortgages and are probably having huge losses on them. The assumption is that the new money will allow them to lend more. I don't know about that. A 28 day reprieve? What if the fed doesn't roll it over after 28 days? And $200 billion is a lot of money.

Third, this may be funded by AAA rated MBSes, but many of them are just junk in the guise of AAA, because of lousy rating by the agencies. What happens when these mortgages turn into defaults? Nobody knows, and it's likely the Fed won't accept them as securities anymore...tough.

I'm not sure how this changes anything, but supposedly people in the US like it because their market went up some 400 points (3.5%) yesterday. We tried to follow but someone figured India is really slowing down, as the Jan Industrial output showed some sub-6% growth, and on top of that some lousy industry figures. So we started big and then went back to where we were yesterday.

So my take is: People were waiting for some good news to buy, any news really. And a lot of shorts caved yesterday and took the index higher. So in the next few days, there will be more good news - as the Fed cuts interest rates again - and some more shorts will go out the door in the US. And then we will get the next round of really-bad-news from the banks and we're back to square one. Except we'll be back to square zero this time. The 1 year trend is still bearish.

In India I'm still ambivalent. We should move DOWN in the 1 year time frame, but now it looks like a consolidation phase. Most likely violent moves up, violent moves down types. Fun times!

Disclosure: Short the Nifty index; own put options.

Budget 2008 Raises Your Salary. Find out How Much.

3 comments Written on March 9th, 2008 by
Categories: IncomeTax
So I've been doing a lot of Javascript coding (ignore that if it sounds like greek) so here is my latest application, made on a whim on Saturday night after my son decided to sleep early for the first time in what seems like 30 years.

ICICI Bank – More On Credit Derivatives

1 Comment » Written on March 9th, 2008 by
Categories: ICICI Bank, Subprime
Chanda Kochhar says a few interesting things in an interview with Mint:
... there are four things that have contributed to the $264 million figure: $69 million credit derivatives losses that have already been provided for by the bank, $20 million provided for in the books or our subsidiaries for similar losses, an estimated $70 million for further erosion in value in January and $100 million for investments by our subsidiaries.
Interesting - they still maintain that they had provided $69 million (350 cr.) earlier, when it seems from their publicly available transcripts that they had only allocated 260-280 cr.

Now they have allocated a further $170 million. That is around 680 cr. which should technically halve their net profit. Will have to wait and see.

Considering that the spreads have dramatically increased since January - a further 10% if not more - chances are they will need at least $100 - $200 million MORE at the end of March. Of course they can choose not to take it - our regulators seem to be fairly lax on this issue - and they can randomly pick a number from the air and throw it at us. Still, if we believe that they're honest, we must see another 400-800 cr., apart from the 680 cr. write down already.

Note: According to this interview, they have $2.2 billion in credit derivatives and $4 billion in credit investments.

What are the underlying securities on the collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) that ICICI bought?

We cannot disclose the names. But as I have said, we have exposure to 65% Indian firms and 35% overseas and all of them are investment grade. They are continuously rated by external global rating agencies.

...

A typical CDO is sold in three tranches according to risk and maturity—low risk, medium risk and high risk. Do you hold the riskiest tranches of the CDO in your books?

About $1.6 billion is credit swaps or credit-linked notes, the lowest risk category. We also have about $600 million collateralized debt obligation. They are of medium risk

Rating agencies aren't much to go by, it seems. They still have AAA on companies like Ambac and MBIA, both of which are pretty much insolvent. The agencies have re-rated a lot of CDOs recently, moving them from AAAs to nearly junk.

Now ICICI has only $600 million in CDOs, which is good - but the term "medium risk" scares me. CDOs are usually structured so that the first 10% or so is high risk, another 5% is medium risk and the rest are "low risk" (called the AAA tranche or the senior tranche). The first 10% that default, are taken by the high risk holder - called the equity tranche - which is typically owned by the loan originators (banks who gave out the loan). The next 5% to default get absorbed by the medium risk or the mezzannine tranche, and the rest is by the seniors.

Now you can say that 65% of companies being Indian, they won't default. (I don't buy that, but still) They have about 35% non Indian companies out there, with a global recession. It will take just 15%-20% defaults on the entire CDO to wipe out the mezzannine tranche.

In general 15%-20% defaults are way off the mark. But in today's recessionary state the risk is much higher; this is indicated in the market spreads, which is why there are MTM losses. The point is: If there were no MTM losses, the bank would have held the credit risk and it would remain "unknown" - and suddenly out of the blue, we could see $600 million loss because the CDO tranche went bust. Would you rather have that, or work with market to grade the investment according to the prices other people are paying, so you always have an idea where you stand? I would choose the latter any day, regardless of whether the intention of ICICI is to hold to maturity or not.

Swaps and notes are also impacted with failures when the senior tranches are hit. Regardless of whether the "hit" is caused by an Indian or foreign company.

Lastly, Indian companies are not immune from the global recession. It is likely the debt that ICICI has taken on through derivatives has no recourse to the Indian company - for instance, Corus can take on debt where if it defaults, lenders can't go ask Tata Steel to pay. Meaning, even sound Indian corporates can default abroad and still be sound Indian corporates.

Some more bad news, potentially: ICICI supposedly has a yen denominated loan taken in September, of $1.5 billion. The yen has gone from 114 to the dollar, down to 102, while the dollar/rupee has remained constant (actually rupee has gone a little down against the dollar). The nearly 10% change is to ICICI's disadvantage - an impact of nearly 650 cr. on the capital. I don't know if they actually have this loan right now, and if they hedged the currency risk - but this is something to look out for.

I don't want to sound so bearish that people overreact. Do not do crazy things like removing your fixed deposits from ICICI Bank. They are not in a position of insolvency. Of course, there could be other news that is dangerous, but this derivative writedown is not going to kill them, and you should not panic. As shareholders you have reason for concern, especially in a globally tough scenario. I am definitely not long ICICI - their growth is way too slow for their P/E - but I am not yet short. I would be short if a) there is more bad news and b) price actually goes up from here to cross 1000.

Disclosure: No positions. I had a small short position on ICICI futures initiated and closed on Friday itself. Too volatile to trade.

Fidelity Fined For Favouring Brokers

3 comments Written on March 6th, 2008 by
Categories: Commentary
Bloomberg says Fidelity has been fined $1.6 million for taking favours from brokers in response for running transactions through them. The favours involved providing traders with female escorts and drugs, to flights in chartered jets and tickets to sports events.

Even Peter Lynch was charged - in a small way, for asking of favours like tickets and such.

I have no idea if something like this happens in India. Typical funds run money through their own brokerages, fairly openly, and there seem to be no strict rules. Or are there?