Before I start my theory about Subprime Phase 3, I want to clarify one thing. Everything I mention here is a short term
opinion on where things are going. That means a) I don't think this situation will spell doom forever, just that we seem to be starting on a crisis and b) by using the word "opinion" I am weaselling out of being wrong by simply stating, "Maybe not also".
So why this drama now? We already have had two bad shocks, is there a need for a third?
Yes, of course. The shocks need to hurt a lot more than they have. I believe the world has done a lot of financial fine-tuning which will hurt a lot when it unwinds.
Return of the home mortgage problem
Some of you will say it never went away. And you will be right. Foreclosures in the US are at record levels, home inventories are at record levels, commercial real estate is in the dumps, and worse, the highest loan resets are coming up in the next two months.
Citi is aggressively selling whatever it can in other countries - India and Germany I have heard of. Freddie Mac is hiding assets so they don't have to disclose real prices - and indeed, there may be no real prices at all, as no one is currently willing to buy. JP Morgan and a number of banks are firing to keep costs at bay.
Asset backed indices are showing signs of crumbling again (but too early to say). As foreclosures and defaults increase, cities and counties are seeing lower tax revenues and one of them, Vallejo filed for bankruptcy recently. More to follow surely.
Note that this is not just subprime. Subprime reflects the quality of borrower's credit, and referred to the lowest strata. Now the crisis is well spread out with even rich people and companies defaulting. This next edition of the crisis will be a "we are all subprime now" edition, to quote a famous blog.
Bank Failures
At least 150 banks will fail in the U.S. in the next two years, says Marketwatch. I suppose this is inevitable, as more and more banks get caught in a spiralling mortgage crisis, which has blown up to become a lending crisis in general.
Commercial real estate is down, home prices are down, lending is tightened due to much more stringent checks, savings rate was never much anyway etc. This is a sign for aggressive banks to tone down - but most small banks can't, because their cost of funds is high and they have to leverage big in order to even make costs.
Indian banks too are going to be in trouble. With the moral hazard associated with a 72k cr. bailout of agri-borrowers, which agri-borrower will ever want to pay. They'll say - "My neighbour didn't pay his loan and got away. If I don't pay a couple years, I'll also get away". The resentment in that is extreme and will hit way too many banks.
At the retail end, loans are in bad shape. ICICI recently bundled personal loan and vehicle loan portfolios and sold them - either as ABS or as portfolios to Arcil. Other banks are surely doing the same, and it's very likely that the loans are at extremely low prices due to default rates rising. NPAs are increasing dramatically. Also credit standards have been tightened (try to apply for a home loan today), and fee income has dramatically reduced after the derivatives fiasco. CRR increases have reduced leverage capabilities (only a little, but still). With interest rates likely to increase if inflation stays this way, bond prices that banks hold will reduce, and hit their treasury and trading income. Lending is down, deposit rates are high but where do you put the funds, NPAs are increasing, treasury is hit - something will give, and some banks will show the white flag.
Politics
If what's required is tightening the Congress isn't going to be up for it. They already forced SBI to withdraw a circular that halted agri-equipment credit (the bank was facing 17% defaults, the moral hazard effect). They've balked at increasing fuel prices as it hurts their voter base. They don't want to raise interest rates anymore as again, voters take loans. They won't use the forex reserves to any good. They won't even take a hit on taxes to ease prices. They will ban futures trading even if it does not help anything. They don't want to do anything that might actually help the economy in order to be in a good position for the elections next year.
This is stupid, because in the process they will create a crisis of epic proportions which, if they get re-voted to power, they have to live with. But the lure of another 4 years of power is too much, I guess.
The U.S. is in a similar situation. They won't draw on oil reserves despite this price. They will sign a bill that sues OPEC. (Come on now) They will not reduce subsidies for corn farmers in the ill-framed ethanol policy. (India has a crisis of this sort coming up this year)
The refusal of the powers-that-are to take steps to keep the economy stable will hurt us tremendously.
Oil prices that need to break
We are in the end-game of oil prices. Everyone's predicting it will go up. Everyone's waiting and watching a 10% rise practically every week now! Already, funds in the US have the highest ever allocation to commodities and literally everyone is talking about prices going straight up. $200 in a year, $150 next month and so on.
This is the final build up. Anyone who is short crude oil now is probably hurting like crazy. It's only when the last big short is taken out of business, is when the slide will begin (no downside protection!). That may come when oil is $150, or $200, or wherever, but the question is now at what rate, but when.
But the rise of oil in the interim will precipitate the crisis. As more people get on the platform to "hedge", others will exit stocks and bonds that lose value in a rising inflation, rising interest rate scenario. The crisis will hurt asset prices a lot in the coming few months, which in turn will hurt the crisis. (or help the crisis, depending on how you look at it)
Carry trade unwinding
Earlier this year, the US Dollar briefly went below 100 Yen, a sign of carry trade weakness. (Borrow in yen really cheap, and invest in dollars, which doesn't work if the yen appreciates) Now with an oil crisis and a subprime crisis, the US authorities will have to "appear" like they are doing something, like printing more currency or protecting banks or even trying to lower rates some more or some such.
This will weaken the dollar against the yen. May not be against the Euro because the Euro economies will try to do the same thing. Japan has a different set of problems and can't react like this. Effectively I believe the U.S. dollar will go down against the yen, and destroy whatever is left of the carry trade - and there is far more than you and I are aware of.
Ok. Enough.
That's it for now. These were reasons why I believe there will be a crisis coming up soon, in the next two months.
Now for why I only think one or two months. First, oil is heading down by the end of the year. Second, this crisis will kill a lot of the weak players, and some strong ones, meaning they won't need further protection. Third, most of the political damage will be evident by then, and steps are likely to be taken to reverse them, like India driving the rupee up and so on. This will stem inflation. Then we'll have a period of "nothingness" when nothing seems to happen, some scam may emerge, some financial stuff will make news and then die, and so on. This crisis will hurt much more than the last two, and after it, will keep things down but stable. Sorta like communism - everyone is equally poor.
And in the longer term the U.S. will see a problem of deflation and then rapid inflation - that will be Phase 4 of this crisis. It's a little bit like the 70s, and they will find another Volcker. India is likely to emerge stronger after a few years, unless we have a stupid sort of political coalition again, like with the left parties.
So that's me off the soapbox. I could be absolutely wrong and this may turn out to be the beginning of the biggest economy run ever. In which case, I'm happy to eat my words. (The advantage of writing on the internet is that I can swallow air and say I've eaten my words. Bwahaha.)
Disclosure: Do not trade this in the stock markets. Even if I was 100% right, there is absolutely no way to predict when, at what level, to what level, how etc. So please don't take anything I say and try to take advantage before anything happens. DO NOT predict. React.
The Hunt For Leveraged Players
Categories: Commentary
- Traders and Hedge funds have limits on how much they can buy (or short).
- Banks don't.
- Banks help traders who want to trade above their limits, by selling them "swaps" on the underlying future.
- And for the trade, they create a position in the commodity markets. Technically this is a hedge against the swap, but in the market it is an open position. (there's no squared off trade in the market)
- This loophole can't be plugged unless the exchange decides that swaps cannot be issued other than on the exchange, or that banks also get limits.
- If they do this a lot of traders, banks and funds will have to get out and unwind their trades. This is certain to cause volatility in the commodity markets.
Why have trading limits at all? Because of counterparty risk and attempts to corner a market by controlling a large part of it. So this is a loophole to get around trading limits, and the problem now is not controlling a large part, but a payment crisis if the market goes opposite (downwards) to the direction of maximum interest. The payment crisis can be:a) market goes down
b) exchange asks banks to put down more margin
c) banks ask hedge funds to pay extra margin against swap
d) hedge funds says sorry boss, no more money here
e) banks panic and sell whatever positions they had against the swaps
f) prices fall, and some banks have to pay out of their pockets
g) if positions are ultra large, some banks run out of money
Setting limits on banks may help but what if banks choose to have no positions on the exchange at all? Then the bank needn't be afraid of exchange limits - only it's counterparty risk increases - but heck the fees are so lucrative, it might as well be worth it (especially if they find a party on the other side of the swap). So do a swap on the long side of a commodity to one trader or fund, and on the short side to another, and bypass the exchange entirely.
This will obviously result in too much of a gamble, one hedge fund or another will go bust, the bank will be left holding the bag, and eventually some bank will go bust if the move is strong downwards. But unless regulation is set up to regulate swaps, this cannot be avoided.
Is a similar thing happening in India with P-Notes? P-Notes, like swaps, are derivative instruments (ODIs or Offshore Derivative Instruments in SEBI Parlance) that are not traded on an exchange. People abroad buy these notes from an FII, against positions set up in India.
FIIs have position limits on Indian exchanges. But what if they have gone and done more transactions on P-Notes themselves, bypassing the Indian exchanges? Like, against one block of say 1cr. worth Reliance stock, they issue and trade p-notes worth 5 crores? Eventually if the system unwinds on sharp market moves, the unwinding of the notes can result in a crisis at the FII end, and in turn in the Indian markets.
SEBI, I think, has planned to figure this out by issuing a new circular. They ask all FIIs to provide details of how much amount of P-Notes they have issued in comparison with their total assets. That will give them an idea if there is an overleveraged situation.
FIIs have been selling huge values on the exchanges. I don't know if it's a response to this circular (the sales were happening even before this was issued, but that doesn't say much) This can become very interesting. Let's see how it goes.
Posted in Commentary