Archive for May, 2008

Welcome to Subprime Phase 3

1 Comment » Written on May 23rd, 2008 by
Categories: Commentary, Subprime
After Phase 1 of subprime in Aug 2007, and Phase 2 in Feb 2008, we are now going into Phase 3 of the crisis.

I'll explain later about why I think so, because I'm feeling terribly tired today. June-July 2008 should be when it all comes out. Only this time it will not be related only to subprime. This time it will not be related only to the US.

Hints: The usual suspects are oil, inflation and commodities. We have as guerilla warriors US bank further losses from MBS and CDOs, huge foreclosures and loan resets coming up, NPAs in India rising, politics, failure of big-assed companies and banks, and a return of the carry-trade-unwinding.

Coming soon to a theater near you.

GMR and The Pile Of Cash

No Comments » Written on May 22nd, 2008 by
Categories: GMR Infra
Don't you just love it when companies have too much cash.

The reason there is no question mark there is : it's meant to be rhetorical.

GMR Infrastructure announced Q4 results and on the face of it, they look great. On a YoY basis, profits are up 128%! 50 crores of profits even before the company has started ops in Delhi and Hyd! Fantastic no?

No.

From Bloomberg:

Net income climbed to 500 million rupees ($12 million), or 0.27 rupee a share, in the three months ended March 31 from 218.50 million rupees, or 0.13 rupee, a year earlier, the Bangalore-based company said in a statement today. Sales rose 43 percent to 8.85 billion rupees.

Profit before tax and interest from investments in mutual funds and other plans surged to 565.7 million rupees in the fourth quarter from 29.7 million rupees a year earlier, GMR said. The company reported a loss of 433.8 million rupees from its airport operations in the fourth quarter, compared with a gain 190.20 million rupees a year earlier, it said.

Profit in the quarter was crimped by a one-time loss of 578.1 million rupees on account of starting costs and building expenditure on the GMR Hyderabad International airport, which began operations on March 23, the GMR said. The company also made a provision of 250 million rupees for salary dues to employees of the Airports Authority of India at the New Delhi International Airport, GMR said.

So, of 50 crores in profit, 56.57 crores have come from investments in mutual funds. Net of that, the company's lost money.

Still, some of these losses seem to be non recurring in nature. (Read GMR's press release here) The 57 cr. initial expenditure for Hyderabad, the 25 cr. provision for higher pay to employees due to the pay commission reports etc. But these costs are not going away - the Hyd airport will need more capital for upgrades, and the pay commission costs will continue to exist. In fact most of the upfront cost of the Hyd airport will be amortised over years, otherwise they will show massive losses.

They mention that if we take away non recurring costs their profit would be 62.5 cr. for the quarter. But if you remove the mutual fund income (they won't have this level of cash much longer as they'll need it for the airports, power plants and roads - their income would then be down to 12.5 crores.

Now forget all that. Take their 50 cr. noted results at face value, and let's see how phenomenal this growth is.

EPS growth has literally died. From a (split adjusted) 2007 ended full year EPS of 1.11, the 2008 EPS is only Rs. 1.23. Meaning about 10% EPS growth. Current market price: Rs. 150, which is about 120 P/E.

And their existing operations aren't doing that well. Power has grown 10% in income. Roads have given a 1% growth. Airports are meant to be losing anyhow. I expected a lot more of their existing operations to justify the stock price.

They have a lot of interesting stuff coming along. Roads, power plants, and of course, the Hyd, Delhi and Istanbul airports. All these take a long time to turn around, and given the revenue sharing agreements, tend to be profitable only years later. Plus, there's this recession and oil price thing that will further slow things down. The real question is - why are we paying this P/E to a company that has the slow road to profits and that has to borrow and share for everything they do? Answer: it is the pot of gold at the other end.

But that end is getting further and further away.

Disclosure: No positions.

Three Market Idiots by Brett Steenbarger

No Comments » Written on May 22nd, 2008 by
Categories: Uncategorized
Three types of idiots exist in the market, says Brett Steenbarger of Traderfeed.
  1. The True Believer
  2. The Gambler
  3. The Self Promoter
All of us know some of them, I'm sure.

Read the whole article.

Suzlon’s REPower Stake Sale a Negotiating Tactic

7 comments Written on May 21st, 2008 by
Categories: Commentary, Suzlon
DNA: Suzlon Energy hints at selling stake in REpower.
Home-grown Suzlon Energy is looking at selling a part of the stake it holds in German wind energy peer REpower. ...

...“We are holding a 33.85% stake in REpower,” Suzlon chairman and managing director Tulsi Tanti said while announcing the company’s results on Tuesday. “We can translate this value into huge value creation for our stakeholders.”

Suzlon Energy had acquired the REpower stake at 150 euros per share. The shares are currently quoting at 238 euros in the Frankfurt market, a gain of over 90% since the stake was acquired.

Very interesting. Is this a direct fallout of the problems at REPower that Suzlon is facing in being unable to get at the design blueprints, due to a German minority shareholder protection law? (source: WSJ)
...Edison Mission Energy, a unit of Edison International, said the 144-foot-long windmill blades it recently bought from Suzlon have begun to split at three wind-power sites it operates in the Midwest. Suzlon has recalled 1,251 blades from its top-of-the-line turbines, which represent the majority of blades the company has sold to date in the U.S....

... Its troubles don't end there. A year ago, the company bought a controlling stake in a large German turbine manufacturer, REpower Systems AG, in one of India's biggest overseas acquisitions. ...Now, Suzlon can't get its hands on the blueprints. Hamstrung by a German corporate law, Suzlon must offer to buy out minority shareholders before it can demand REpower's designs. It's unlikely that the company could make a tender offer until 2009, say people with knowledge of the companies. ...Mr. Kher blamed the cracks on the Midwest's unexpectedly violent changes in wind direction. Though Mr. Tanti says that only 45 blades have cracked, Suzlon says it will add an extra lamination layer to almost all of the blades it has shipped to the U.S. To repair cracked blades and reinforce the rest, the company expects to spend $30 million.

So first, Suzlon buys around 34% in REPower.

Then it writes puts (basically agreeing to buy REPower shares at a certain price) to Areva, and buys call options from Martifer, it's partner in the buyout, both at the 150 euro price. These are all exercisable in 2009 or so. (This is gleaned from info I've got from various reports) This gives them about 87% voting rights totally. The remaining is held by minority shareholders.

REPower can refuse to give Suzlon blueprints of its technology which, it seems, is superior and of bigger capacity than Suzlon's. That right of refusal is from a law that allows companies to restrict key information from competitors and as Suzlon has not acquired a majority stake, it is still a competitor under German law.

Choices then are: Suzlon acquires 13% of the remaining stake, or a majority stake by exercising the options they own. They don't have the cash. They're not going to get any more debt, with the way markets are, and if they do go this route the high rates will just kill them.

Other choice: Sell the stake they own in the market - after all, REPower trades at 236 euros. But to sell such a big stake they have to do it silently; otherwise market players will want to front-run this and sell their stakes up front - and effectively nullify any gains Suzlon intended to achieve. In fact, REPower shares has fallen about 2% since this story.

So why has Tanti made this announcement? It obviously is not his intention to sell - if it was, he would do it first and then announce it. It is likely to do two things: firstly, keep prices low. This is in it's benefit as Areva, which holds 30% and has the right to sell to Suzlon at market prices. (a put option at 150 would be worthless to Areva, but it can choose to sell at market instead). Effectively, a price reduction gives Suzlon a breather in the payment for Areva's 30% stake.

(In any case I think Suzlon is going to find it difficult to find the money to fund this stake purchase - it's only saviour is if it can find some other knight in shining armour, willing to pay and take over the stake, with voting rights still staying with Suzlon. Tough ask)

The other thing it may do is to force management to rethink restrictions on blueprints. Management gets a good chunk of stock options and they aren't going to be happy to see the 150 price levels again - giving up the blueprints might seem a lesser evil.

This looks to me like a negotiation tactic. Question is: will it work? If Tanti is desperate - and this sounds to me like an act of desperation - will this take a lot more out of the wind energy company than it can hope to give? Time will tell, but if you're an investor watch very carefully.

The stock's at 318, with a recently announced result the EPS is 6.89, up only about 15% from an EPS of Rs. 6 (adjusted for split) last year. The P/E is nearly 45, and Suzlon desperately needs to show some substance soon; wind energy may be fantastic at $129 oil, but if you overleverage your bets, you will go bust before the boom hits you.

Disclosure: No positions. Sorry I didn't write this when I posted first. Have not had positions in this stock for the last five months or so.

Aztec’s Story – From Rs. 80 to Rs. 80

No Comments » Written on May 18th, 2008 by
Categories: Aztecsoft, Mindtree
In the second half of 2000, Bangalore was splashed with billboard advertisements about the next new thing, the software company anyone should want to work for. Aztec, it called itself, and the pedigree was impeccable.

Started, by J. Parthasarathy with funding from Exodus founder K.B. Chandrashekar (through e4e), the company became this hot-shot to-be-competition for the likes of Infy and TCS.

The IPO went through at Rs. 80 per share. It listed around Rs. 100, and soon collapsed with the .com bust. It hit lows of Rs. 13.35 in 2003, and rose with the general bull run to hit highs of 228 in 2006. Then it was all the way down to the current price of Rs. 74.

And now Mindtree acquires e4e's stake in Aztec at Rs. 80 per share. Mindtree already has bought nearly 30% in the market. There will be an open offer for another 20%, and eventually a merger into Mindtree.

This is the culmination of a 7.5 year saga of Aztec. From Rs. 80, back to Rs. 80 - no splits, bonuses, and a total dividend of Rs. 2.1 added up in all these years. The company shuttled from profits to losses and back a number of times.

What does Mindtree get out of this? Software companies usually don't have too many assets, but it could be the people. Looks like the management and employees are starting to sell their holdings - V. Chandrashekharan, the CEO and other key employees such as CIO, Director etc. have dramatically cut down their stake. Will they stay? If they don't, will Mindtree be able to retain their client relationships? Only time will tell.

But it's the age of consolidation for the next tier of IT service companies. To compete they need the size, so expect a lot more mergers.

Nifty EPS growth now 11%

No Comments » Written on May 17th, 2008 by
Categories: Commentary
On Feb 11, I'd written that Nifty's yearly EPS growth was only 13%.

The story gets worse.

As of May 16, EPS growth has been just 11%, from 211.72 last year same time to 235.08. And the current P/E: 22.

But this time there are 15 companies that haven't announced results yet, some of them being very high EPS growth ones (Unitech, L&T, NPTC, Sunpharma). But there are laggards too (BPCL, ONGC, Tisco, ITC) who are expected to show 10% growth or less. The weightage of all the not-yet-announced result companies is 23% of the index, and if they do well the EPS growth may change substantially.

The picture will get clearer in June, but this is not looking good at all. We are literally at the same Nifty value as of Feb 2008 and the P/E hasn't changed - means that despite these quarterly results, we have gained ZERO percent quarter on quarter.

Good news, though, on the technical front is that life looks good till May end. There is a lot of put buildup at 5,000 and new institutional buying is being seen in the last week. Things are likely to get better before they get worse. But they are going to get worse, unless we see stellar results in the next two weeks.

Inflation, Oil and Exchange Rates

3 comments Written on May 17th, 2008 by
Categories: Commentary
Inflation is at 7.85%, a 44 month high. And oil hits $128 for reasons unknown, but everyone speculates on the causes.

With the INR-USD rate at Rs. 42.5+, the cause is said to be oil refineries increasing buys. But why isn't RBI selling dollars like crazy and keeping the exchange rate stable? It's silly to say at one end that they won't use the exchange rate to control inflation, but then watch the exchange rate go the other way and hurt inflation MUCH MUCH more.

There is literally no interest-rate arbitrage happening - otherwise we would have hugely balancing funds coming in to take advantage. In fact the dollar rising removes the arbitrage completely - as the 5% differential in interest rates is taken away by the 5% fall in the rupee.

There is a need, to get the exchange rate to Rs. 38 or lesser immediately. If they really want to control inflation, that is. But if they really do not interfere, I believe the markets will take it down to there - or even to levels of 35 very soon.

Interest rates are going to have to rise eventually as governments increasingly see a need to demonstrate some action, even if that action does not amount to any real change. See what they did with commodity futures - banning trading in potatoes, which has actually DECLINED in value this year.

It's not the result, but the action that counts. Our country is doomed to behave, financially, like a Balaji Telefilms TV serial - all emotion and no substance.

ICICI Commercial Vehicle Loans Downgraded

3 comments Written on May 17th, 2008 by
Categories: Commentary, ICICI Bank
From FT:
The rating agency CRISIL has downgraded ICICI Bank's securitised commercial vehicle loan pool worth over Rs 82 crore due to a drop in collections from repayments. The rating has been revised from "AA- (so)" to "BBB+ (so)".

This is the second instance of downgrade for ICICI Bank in a span of 30 days. Last month, the private sector bank's securitised car and personal loan pool worth over Rs 203 crore was revised downward from "AAA (so)" to "AA (so)" due to rising defaults on payments by borrowers.

Commenting on the downgrade, CRISIL said the performance of the pool has been marked by a higher-than-expected use of cash collateral. The cash collateral is an arrangement (cushion) for making payments to those who have invested in securitised paper when the collections for borrowers show a decline.

...

This pool was securitised in December 2005 and 27 months after securitisation, the pool amortised by about 78 per cent. The credit collateral stipulated at the time of rating was Rs 6.8 crore, of which around 79 per cent has been utilised. This level of utilisation is much higher than the rating agency's expectations.

The delinquencies, including repossession losses in the loan pool, are also high at 8.6 per cent for 90-plus days.

SO ICICI Bank securitised some loans by pooling them together (I didn't even know this was happening - but it's good). The investors in this pool get a fixed rate of return as borrowers on the loans pay up their interest payments. When interest payments are lower than expected due to defaults, ICICI bank pays out of the cash collateral it has included in the pool. When that cash also runs out, the investors start to lose money (in order of the seniority of the tranches they purchased)

There must be other loans that are delinquent for less than 90 days, and that is likely to make the default hit higher than 8.6%.

This has a lower impact on ICICI bank - because it has sold the risk to other investors - but it takes a hit on the cash collateral and also on any tranches it still owns (the most junior are likely to be retained by the originating bank).

But the impact can be for the other such securitised loans or for future securitisations - as investors (most likely mutual funds and other institutions) will demand higher returns for the higher risk involved.

Are we getting into phase I of India-Subprime? Securitised loan downgrades are first signs of visibility - the loans that banks DON'T securitise are extremely opaque and delingquencies there are not revealed this publicly. But if this trend continues, defaults are going to be a serious issue going forward.

Some more: Citi sees rising NPAs

Citigroup on Thursday said it was not exiting the consumer finance business in India, but had decided to reposition its products due to a rise in defaults in recent months.

Refusing to disclose details, Citi India Chief Executive Officer Sanjay Nayar told reporters that non-performing assets (NPAs) in the consumer finance segment were much larger than expected, but added that business remained "satisfactory".

Also read: Co-op bank NPAs rise, SBI credit card defaults cause concern, Banking sector shows good numbers in Q4.