Archive for 2010

Primary Articles Inflation Spikes to 17.24%

9 comments Written on December 31st, 2010 by
Categories: Inflation, InterestRates

Whoa. The latest WPI data on primary articles has taken WPI inflation on primary articles to 17.24%.

WPI primary articles at 17.24%

Dangerously, the past revision spikes are reoccurring. Just look at the last two revisions:

Date First Report Revision Difference
16/10/2010 16.62% 17.91% 1.29%
23/10/2010 15.43% 17.09% 1.66%

 

On a graph this looks pretty bad:

Primary Articles Inflation: Revisions

At the rate this is going, we may be at 19% on Primary Articles, which we’ll find out after the data is revised. But note that this week and perhaps the next month has a big base effect. (last year wasn’t too bad during this time)

Primary articles -Food, base materials etc. – is where inflation is seen first. This impacts input prices of derived items like packaged food, or cars or whatever. WPI doesn’t take into account rent or services, but it’s safe to assume that primary articles inflation will move into manufactured goods also with a time lag, if it’s not a temporary price move.

That means, if there’s a short-term spike (like some onion prices going up to Rs. 80 for a week and then falling back to Rs. 20), then the companies at the other end of the chain might opt for a margin squeeze rather than raising prices. A restaurant that uses onions won’t increase its prices immediately on a price spike of onions – if that went away in a week, they’ll say “tough week” and move on.

But if prices remain consistently high at the primary level (inputs), then the manufacturers won’t have much choice. And when they hike prices, it’s more “sticky” – they don’t revise often, but when they do, they stick with the revision for a while. Now WPI primary articles inflation has been about 15% for most of the year and has again gone above it, and this is about when there is going to be a squeeze, and manufactured goods prices will go up.

The RBI has absolutely no option now but to raise rates, but that won’t help immediately. What it has done till now is to only kinda-sorta raise the short-term rate to about 7%. In fact we have a FLAT yield curve which 1 year money around 7.1% and 10 yr. bonds about 7.9%. In other places though, money is substantially more expensive – CDs and Commercial Paper are going at 9-10%.

This is not good for the economy, and because we have a slow transmission system, we will see high inflation and high interest rates for a while – as much as 12 months – before things get under control. Somewhere along the way, markets will crash. That is just how markets have to react, because high-everything is not sustainable and people will get jittery. You will get reports of how inflation and interest rates and liquidity will do serious damage if you don’t get out now, but by that time it will already be too late; typically we see the impact of inflation much after inflation has occurred. 

But since we’ll see growth first (inflation is very good for stocks in the short term) => the markets should go up first. How much, I don’t know. To quote Soros, markets are unpredictable so why bother predicting them.

That was a LONG rant. I’m very wary of getting into interest rate sensitives (banks, real estate, auto) – in fact, am rethinking my Ashok Leyland pick now. It will be very interesting to find zero debt companies and watch them over the next year; they should really benefit, and there are a lot of them nowadays.

From a technical perspective, this is a non market until it crosses the previous high. Though some stocks are showing enthu, I would wait for the market to respond.

At Yahoo: Taking Stock of Commissions

11 comments Written on December 30th, 2010 by
Categories: Yahoo

I write at Yahoo! about Taking Stock of Commissions:

On May 1, 1975, fixed commissions were abolished on Wall Street. From an era of charging fixed commissions on a per-share or percentage basis, the model moved to "negotiated" commissions - charge anything they wanted. The day was called "Mayday" - an indication of the distress the industry felt about losing the profitability of cartelized price control. On October 27, 1986, the same thing happened in the UK, and the day was called the "Big Bang Day". Losing fixed commissions seems equivalent, in the industry, to Armageddon; but in both the cases above, after a brief hiatus, the UK and US have only benefited with the reform. They are now the largest markets in the world.

India has only started down this route - let's see where the primary investment avenues lie with respect to commissions.

Buying Shares

In India, stock broker commissions are not fixed, but they are strangely convoluted. When you buy a stock, you usually get charged a percentage of the trade value - that is, quantity multiplied by the share price, usually between 0.1% and 0.5%. And that's just brokerage. My contract note - a sheet that has everything that's charged to me for each trade - has all these additional charges:

  • Service tax and Cess: a 10.3% tax on the brokerage, paid to the government.
  • Securities Transaction Tax (STT) : 0.25% of the trade value, only applicable when I sell, goes to the government.
  • Stamp Duty, Turnover Charges: Regulatory fees payable to the state, exchange or SEBI, usually a percentage of trade value - about 0.004%. This is so small they might only quote it as "400 rupees per crore".

In addition, some brokers charge a demat fee of about Rs. 15 per transaction and annual demat or account charges. To complicate matters further, brokerage, STT and exchange fees are different for intraday trading (buying and selling within the day), futures and options. Specifically in options, the brokerage is ridiculously high - upto 2.5% of premium paid or received with a minimum "per-lot" charge, usually Rs. 50 or so. Read the rest of this entry »

Readings: Guarantees, Neta-Babu, Term Plans

5 comments Written on December 30th, 2010 by
Categories: Readings

Readings after a hiatus:

Dhirendra Kumar takes a jab at the labour ministry for asking for a “guarantee” of equity returns. The labour min seemingly asks for a guarantee and a minimum return – yeah, what’s different between that and buying government bonds, one would think. The EPFO looks screwed, with the corpus of 5 trillion (lakh cr.) that needs to pay out either 8.5% or 9.5%; if they fall short, they will need the government to put in money.

About 100 years ago: The New York Stock Exchange decreed that commissions of 1/8% is sacred, it will be charged for all transactions, even outside the exchange. From then to now, what a difference. (That’s about 15 basis points, still lesser than what delivery transactions in India tend to cost)

The National Housing Bank (NHB) has increased the risk weights and provisioning for housing finance companies (HDFC, LIC Housing Finance etc.). Loan to value above 90% isn’t allowed, and for loans of 20 lakhs or more, the limit is 80%. Additionally, risk weights of loans above 75 lakhs are at 125% – that is just following what RBI did for banks in November. Provisioning for teaser loans goes to 2%. Obviously this is a non-issue – the stocks didn’t even flinch.

I didn’t know this – NHB has banned prepayment penalties for pre-closure of housing loans if the money is paid through the buyer’s own sources.

Manish Chauhan at Jago Investor has an excellent review of term insurance plans. The data’s outdated, a little bit – let me see if I can expand on this a bit.

Sucheta Dalal on the Mutant Superbug, the increasing neta-babu nexus that we will just not stop. While she makes many allegations without presenting any evidence*, the main point she makes is valid – we seem to have an even higher neta-babu control over our economy.

* Like “stock tips in lieu of cash”, etc. I believe that might be true, but in the absence of evidence, it’s just a random allegation. Did she hear someone say it? But like Niira Radia said Kalal Nath “can make his 15 percent”, that doesn’t make it true. It has to be not just believable but true; especially when there is more research possible. Note: even I make this mistake a lot.

Primary Articles Inflation at 15.35%, up 2%

No Comments » Written on December 29th, 2010 by
Categories: Inflation

Primary articles is up 2% since last week, and stands at 15.35%.

Primary Articles Inflation

I’d mentioned that last year this was a benign period, and I expect headline inflation numbers to stay high for the next few weeks anyway. Add to it the fuel price hikes, skyrocketing onion prices, increase in sugar prices (not yet in India) and the transition into manufactured goods and WPI as a whole is likely to stay very high.

(Note: Overall inflation is only reported once a month. PA inflation is announced every week)

Past revisions continue to be a problem, as the 16 Oct. data was revised to 17.91%, substantially higher than the first reported 16.62%.

Past Revisions of Primary Articles Inflation

Previous Inflation Posts:

Reader Query: Should I exit this ULIP?

1 Comment » Written on December 29th, 2010 by
Categories: ULIP

Reader S writes in:

Hey Deepak,
I am invested in 2 ULIPS.
1) Birla Sun Life SaralWealth : 35800 anually since Feb 2010 ( paid 1 premiums) current fund value is 25629.
2) Birla sun life Dream Plan: 12000 anually since Jan 2009 ( paid 2 premiums) current value is 20762
I also have a term policy of Birla sunlife premium of 7k annually and cover of 50 lakhs.
I was totally shocked to see 11000 deducted as loading charges on SaralWealth.
Please advice what would be the right time to get out of the policies and which policy should I retain.

Birla Saral Wealth Plan

You seem to have the 20 year, 20 pay plan.  From the brochure, this plan has

  • 30% charges of the first three years premium. Nothing after that. But they’ve already stolen enough.
  • 0.25% per month as admin charges – ridiculous again, that’s a 3% charge over the year, which for you is Rs. 1000 per year more.
  • Surrender charges of 1 premium (for you) less than three years, 1/2 a premium in the fourth year, and 1/4th a premium in the fifth.
  • No surrender charge after five years

Given that they have already stolen 33% of your money (30% commission, plus 3% admin charges) and you have only 25K left in the fund, let’s see what you can do. You have two choices:

  • surrender by letting the policy lapse
  • and Invest in the future in a simple mutual fund (the insurance they offer is 2 lakhs cover. That will cost Rs. 800 per year, so let’s take that out and put only 35,000 into the MF)

You can do the above two options this year, or put in one more premium of 35,800 this year and take this decision next year, and so on. Let’s assume both options give you 10% returns, and let’s look at where you will be in five years.

Assumptions:

  1. 33% load for next two years, 3% subsequently.
  2. Invest 35K in mutual fund, but 35,800 in ULIP.
  3. ULIP Mortality charges assumed to be Rs. 700 per year.

Check out the spreadsheet – you can copy it and modify formulas if you like. Tell me if there’s something wrong.

As you might notice, the best options for your money is either to get out now (1.78 lakhs after five years) or stay for five years (1.83 lakhs). Getting out now might be marginally better if you think a mutual fund can do a better job in terms of performance. You’ll get nothing, but mark it to experience – you will end up paying about the same amount as commissions if you stay with the policy. On the other hand, if you want to hold on, pay the next four years premiums – getting out anywhere else in the middle is financially a negative.

Anything else is not worth it. There may be an issue with tax – I have heard it said that if you exit an insurance policy within five years, you have to pay back the 80C exemption (if used) in past years.

Birla Dream Plan

I’ve written about this plan before, and I think it is only useful as a plain term plan, not as an investment at all. Now you will need to do your calculations as I’ve done it above for the saral plan to figure out if it’s better to exit now or wait.

It’s easier to say “don’t buy a ULIP” than to say “exit now”. All exits need to be measured, for opportunity costs and other such details. 

At Yahoo: Innovations and Curses

1 Comment » Written on December 29th, 2010 by
Categories: Yahoo

At Yahoo, I write about Innovations and Curses:

In the last 10 years, India has grown at a rate that defies belief. Yet, the rate of growth and the dramatic increase in technology that accompanies it has come with certain curses — the side-effects of what has been a fantastic decade for India.

Curse #1: Floating Rates, Pre-closure charges, Teaser-rates

Home loans have, in the past, been sold as fixed rate loans where you pay a fixed rate of interest for the tenure of the loan. For about seven years now, banks have been pushing floating rate loans hard — where interest rates change according to the bank's lending rates. Now floating rate loans aren't necessarily bad; because banks borrow short-term (1-3 years, through deposits) and lend long term, when short-term interest rates go up, fixed rate loans hurt the bank since they get only that much interest but have to pay out more. Floating rate loans gives them the ability to adjust both lending and borrowing rates.

Unfortunately, the practice is now a curse — to squeeze the maximum out of customers, banks have only raised rates at the drop of a hat. When interest rates fell, banks refused to cut lending rates — which made the concept of "floating" more like a one-way street, in favour of the banks. Another trick was to create different internal "benchmark" lending rates — so new customers were offered loans that floated with a lower benchmark rate to attract new business, but existing customers were linked to a higher different benchmark rate. The RBI has recently tried to curb this practice by making fresh loans linked to only one rate called a "base" rate, but the multiple benchmarks for the old loans will continue. Read the rest of this entry »

Out For A Few Days

1 Comment » Written on December 21st, 2010 by
Categories: Uncategorized

As I have family over, I might not be available for the next few days – till the 27th. Catch you then, and Merry Christmas!

RBI Keeps Rates Unchanged; Liquidity Tight

No Comments » Written on December 16th, 2010 by
Categories: Inflation, InterestRates

RBI keeps rates unchanged at 6.25% (repo) and 5.25% (reverse repo). 

The Statutory Liquidity Ratio (SLR) is down to 24% (down 1%). There’s also a relaxation of another 1% of assets under a temporary liquidity facility until Jan 28, 2011.

Inflation: November 2010

WPI monthly inflation for Nov 2010 was announced at 7.48% – substantially lower than the last month’s 8.58%.

image

Past revision: Sept 2010 was revised up to 8.93% from the earlier reported 8.62%.

Yes, WPI inflation is moderating. I think past revisions make the data unreliable. Still, all things remaining as they are, we should moderate – the high base and the crop availability will cut prices down. But, things never stay as they are, no?

And for Primary Articles, we have:

Data for 4 Dec 2010 says primary articles inflation is at 13.25%.

image

Again, another upward revision in past data, takes inflation for week of 9-Oct to 19.03% up from the 18.05% reported. Note the uptick this last week – revisions two months later will tell us where we really are.

Oh and petrol prices are up, but diesel is not. It won’t hit inflation much – because it’s just 1.09% of WPI. But it affects you and me a lot more. That’s how distanced the index is from the real world!

Liquidity Tight

Since short term money is hard to come by and banks are being absolute *****s about raising their retail deposit rates, the solution seems to be to infuse liquidity through bond repurchases by the RBI, upto 48,000 crore in the next month. Now I like this concept – i.e. I think instead of holding foreign exchange reserves, the RBI is better served holding Indian government bonds instead. But it is only an unintended consequence – banks need to immediately raise short term retail deposit rates (like 3 or 6 month deposits) to the levels of 8-9% as a temporary measure, until they sort things out. They’ll suddenly find ample liquidity.

Just yesterday, RBI bought about 11,700 crores of 6, 7 and 10 year bonds – between 7.90% and 8.07%.

Previous Inflation Posts:

(More on Inflation)