November 2010 IIP comes in at 2.7% Growth

2 comments Written on January 12th, 2011 by
Categories: IIP

I don’t trust the (first estimate of) Index of Industrial Production that is released monthly by MOSPI, because it is subject to so many revisions that everything gets invalidated later. Today, they’ve released the index for November and it is at 317.9, a level that points to just 2.7% growth over November 2009.

IIP at 2.7% in November 2010

Immediately after this release markets dropped, but honestly, with a data point that is so volatile, and goes through so many revisions, there’s no point reacting to a headline figure. November’s usually weak, but this November’s the weakest in five years (caveat: could be revised later!)

You might find the sub-item charts more interesting, though.

IIP (Mining)

IIP (Manufacturing)

IIP (Electricity)

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Related posts:

  1. June 2010 IIP at 7.13% MOSPI released the Index of Industrial Production (Quick Estimate) for...
  2. November IIP grows 11.7% The Index of Industrial Production (IIP) grew 11.7% in November...
  3. FIIs Starting To Exit in November 2010? Foreign investors seem to have reduced their allocations to India...
  4. IIP Data: Drops by 0.4% in October The Index of Industrial Production is at 261.5 today, a...
  5. August 2010 IIP comes in at 5.6% The Index of Industrial Production (IIP) has grown 5.6% to...
About the Author: Deepak Shenoy
http://www.capitalmind.in
The man behind Capital Mind. Deepak is a co-founder at MarketVision, a financial knowledge company in Gurgaon. He also provides data research and consulting services in the financial markets space. Connect with him at deepakshenoy@gmail.com.

2 comments “November 2010 IIP comes in at 2.7% Growth”

>He Deepak,

Your views are exactly same as Sandip Sabharwal :)

Why they revise this data??

>Thanks:) Now he's a legend!

Revisions happen when you get fresh data. The revisions are wild because the mechanism to collect data for the first estimate seems to be flawed.


Leave a Reply