Tamal Bandyopadhyay has a great article on the growing NPA situation in banks. While many public sector lender NPAs have gone up, the NPAs in private banks have fallen. This could
Some banks are looking for an easy way out to tackle the problem—loan restructuring—but this can only delay the inevitable. In 2009, after an unprecedented global credit crunch, RBI had asked banks to recast loans across sectors where borrowers were under stress. Roughly about 5% of loans were restructured at that time.
Many of the restructured loans have started turning bad. That’s not good news. But what is more worrying is that banks have been looking for restructuring loans given to troubled sectors and firms and asking for special dispensation from the regulator so that they do not need to set aside money for such restructured loans, which otherwise would have turned bad.
In May, RBI tightened the provisioning requirements on certain categories of NPAs and restructured loans, but that’s not enough. Indeed, restructuring of any loan should be left to the banks’ commercial judgement and if they find that a moratorium on loan repayment or a cut in interest rate could help a borrower repay their money they should be allowed to do so, but banks must set aside money even for such restructured loans till they turn good. Otherwise, restructuring of loans will simply be a mechanism to bring down NPAs.
Essentially, if you restructure a loan, you needn’t reserve much for it (other than 2% – that 2% is chump change). Banks, in the case of Air India, didn’t even want to put in that 2%, which tells you how incredibly levered the system is!
Concept: If I can’t pay back a loan – interest or principal – for three months, I’m a “bad asset” for a bank. But if I say that listen, give me a year, and I’ll start paying back everything, even if you charge me a higher interest rate, then I’m a “restructured asset”. This is how it works in theory. When too many loans go bad, the bank is scared of calling them all bad assets, so they “restructure” even if they know that the loan won’t turn good after a while. The thought is to move the problem to later – not very different from the way it was done in the subprime crisis in the US.
Tamal has it right – when a bank’s loan book grows fast, but the proportion of bad assets falls, and there is an economic slowdown of some sort in India, it all fails the smell test.
Related posts:
- Air India Restructuring Approved, Wants 43K cr. RBI agrees to restructuring proposal by Air India: Air India...
- RBI Release: Rate Cuts, Sector Sops The RBI has cut rates by 1%. The Repo rate...
- Stimulus, Rate cuts And More We have yet another stimulus package! Rate cuts: The RBI...
- Links – Euro Bailout Hidden Clauses, 3G Fund Raising, 4000 cr. for Mumbai property Mahindra may take over Reva for 450 cr. Reva’s small...
- Mutual Fund NFOs have Hidden Costs New Fund Offers (NFOs) by Mutual Funds are common. In...
Hi Deepak,
Good Point. I myself was very very surprised to see such numbers being reported by most pvt. banks. It is hard to fathom that in a rising rate and slowing economic environment banks are able to actually report lowered NPA’s !!!.
I think a lot of bad assets are neither being classified as NPA or being restructured.I think their could be some jugglery here like rolling over loans, changing loan structure etc..
It would be great if RBI/SEBI can ask banks to publish a list of NPA’s on their corporate/SME clients along with results, cause i am sure few banks would not be still classifying few publicly known NPA’s as bad assets.
02.07.12 at 3:22 PM
Almost every bank I have come across gives details about their restructured books. If you read any analyst conf call transcript, analysts do pretty detailed queries on their restructured books and these include figures outside of CDR.
So I am not sure how factually correct this article is, sure the amount they need to reserve is not much, but the fact is that the restructured book of banks is known.
02.07.12 at 7:35 PM
Restructuring is consolidated – no one will ever give you case level details for privacy and non-compete reasons. Gross level measures can be quite interesting: for instance ICICI Bank has seen a drop in NPAs from 102 bn down to 98 bn, but at the same time restructured assets went up from 25 bn to 30bn.
It’s not that restructured assets are being “hidden” – it is that NPAs are being disguised as Rrestructured assets :)
02.07.12 at 8:25 PM
The RBI encourages accounting window dressing frequently for banks during difficult times.
I remember in ~2003 they changed the bond valuation norms for PSU banks one time to avoid showing massive losses.
All these gimmicks are regular. Notice one publicly quoted MFI “securitze” assets? Why ? Who gains? Why now?
Get used to it. RBI also “fixes” the system.
02.07.12 at 9:05 PM