Analysis

Greenlight Capital’s Detailed Presentation on GMCR

6 comments Written on October 20th, 2011 by
Categories: Analysis

On Monday, Greenlight Capital (of David Einhorn fame) threw up a presentation  on a stock that was, before that day, an investor darling: Green Mountain Coffee Roasters (GMCR). This is a US listed company. Post the presentation the stock absolutely tanked, down 10% first and then, down 15% yesterday.

Greenlight’s 110 presentation talks in detail  about the company’s business model, which had evolved into a razor/razor blade model where they would sell a single cup brewing machine at cost, and charge heavily for “K-Cups” – a patented coffee filter + grounds + cup combination that goes into their brewers. They’ve already sold 13 million brewers and over 9 billion K-cups, growing CAGR 57% since 2010.

image

Except now, there’s a problem, says Greenlight. The market valued GMCR at $92, even when it’s projected 2011 EPS was just $1.61, because of the immense long term value perceived. The expectation was the sales would continue to be strong and deals like their recent ones with Starbucks would augment revenues, to bring the longer term EPS to $9 per share. What Greenlight finds is that they have probably overestimated the metrics used to calculate such long term value: Read the rest of this entry »

Is the Indian Internet a Bubble?

17 comments Written on August 3rd, 2011 by
Categories: Analysis

With the valuation at Flipkart going to $1bn, that is the question. $1bn is 4,500 crores, more than the other "real" internet company listed in India, Info Edge, which is currently valued at about 4,000 cr. $1bn, for a company with less than 100 cr. in FY11, with potentially some losses.

Read the rest of this entry »

Nifty Stocks Below Short Term MAs: Peak?

No Comments » Written on July 22nd, 2011 by
Categories: Analysis, Nifty

I've mentioned this in the MarketVision Chronicle earlier (See this note) that when the Net Number of stocks above short term moving averages tops or bottoms out it usually indicates a short term market move. (Net stocks = Number of stocks above MINUS number of stocks below; I take the 5 day average of this figure to smoothen it out, for short term MAs, and a 10 day average for the long term MAs).

image image

See this post for an earlier image of what I thought was a potential bottom. In the recent past this indicator has peaked before the index has, but it can be way too early and can fake you out. What's evident from the recent past is that a cross below the zero line is decidedly negative for the index. I'll keep looking.

Plus I have to shape this better - the number of days a stock stays below and the distance from the MA should count for something, and I have to include that as well.

Stocks Above Moving Averages, Bottoms Out

No Comments » Written on May 28th, 2011 by
Categories: Analysis

Two interesting charts: of the Net Nifty stocks above short and long term moving averages:

image  image

(Click for larger pictures)

I created them - using some code and downloaded data.

Turns out the 20 DMA line - red on the left chart - has bottomed out for this cycle and the longer term MA charts too have turned upwards. Will we then continue this uptrend till the DMA+ numbers zoom upwards? I need to check these charts more frequently.

I must extend this to see how far stocks are from their respective averages if they are above or below and then plot it. That way a stock being very close to its MA gets a lower weight than one that's moved further away.

EMI Principal and Interest Calculator

15 comments Written on April 5th, 2007 by
Categories: Analysis, HomeLoans
I was asked how EMI interest and principal works - the idea of that is kinda complex, like the calculation describes. But the essential funda is: Take the total amount payable, pay the interest first and the remaining part of your EMI is the principal. You can calculate this easily using spreadsheet functions like PMT, PPMT and IPMT. I have demonstrated this, on a monthly basis, by using this excel sheet: This is just for 12 months but you can extend it for any number of months.

You can find out exactly how much you've repaid at any month and how much is left, and of course, you see how your interest is front loaded on any such loan.

You can view the spreadsheet or download in Excel format.

Wrong data can affect good analyses

No Comments » Written on April 3rd, 2007 by
Categories: Analysis, Stocks
Sometimes wrong data can be extremely harmful - I noted earlier that the Sensex P/E is incorrectly calculated, and uses outdated earnings.

But being the only source of data for the Sensex, the ratio on their page gets used for most analyses, and these analyses may suddenly seem wrong in the context of the newer values.

Look at this analysis by Vivek Kundnani, about how the P/E expansion in India looks like it will hamper returns. It's evident from his graph that the P/E today is higher than earlier, but by how much? If you take the last four Q earnings, the EPS graph will be substantially more sloping and the P/E will seem more exciting.

And he says:

Using the current EPS of Rs. 656 and the average P/E multiple over the past 10 years of 17, the BSE Sensex should be at, and brace yourselves for this, 11,150; 25% below current levels. Even if the BSE Sensex can sustain a higher than average multiple of 19 (because “it’s different this time”), we get a value of 12,460, 15% below current levels. These valuations are definitely not attractive to rational investors.
Now this article was written in Feb 2007 when the Sensex was around the 14,000 levels. Since then, it has fallen 15%, but it's now reached the 12,460 value Vivek talks about. But the P/E is actually 16.4 (considering trailing 4Q EPS) and not 19! Will it still stay unattractive?

Sensex P/E calculation awry?

6 comments Written on April 3rd, 2007 by
Categories: Analysis, Stocks
Update: This entire article is wrong. The P/E calculation is simple: Weighted Market Cap (791,825.38) divided by weighted earnings (40,570.21) which is 19.52, very close to the BSE reported number. That means I am wrong, and the BSE is correct. I'm terrible at mathematics - have made it more complicated and confused myself all ends up. This article will remain for posterity, though, and for the brickbats. And thanks to Akshay J for pointing out my mistake.

Something seems to be wrong with the Sensex Price to Earnings Ratio calculation. Look at the Sensex Index Reach page and you will notice a value there for P/E - the price to earnings ratio of the Sensex.

The Sensex is an index - the BSE 30 Sensitive Index is what it really is - so there's no real company called the "Sensex". So what is the earnings of a non-existent company? How can we calculate even the "number of shares" or any information for what is effectively an amalgamation of other companies, but where the ratios change daily?

The answer lies is the calculation. Since the Sensex is a weighted calculation of the various companies it comprises, the earnings can also be weighted in the same way to get the earnings for the Sensex. Divide that by the weighted number of shares in the index and you have a value called "EPS" or Earnings per share for the Sensex. The P/E then is just the Sensex value divided by the Sensex EPS.

Note that the share prices of each constituent company change daily and therefore, these values will change every day.

But the key here is to take the correct data for "earnings". It seems like the BSE has taken the last reported YEARLY figures instead of considering the last four quarters.

What's the big deal, you ask. What's the difference? On March 29 2007, the last four quarter earnings will include figures for January 2006 to December 2006. But the last reported YEARLY figures is for April 2005 to March 2006! (Most companies offer annualised earnings reports only for April to March financial years).

To validate this, what I did was to manually go through each company and calculate the Sensex P/E myself. Here are the steps I used, as of April 02, 2007:

  1. I read the Sensex "free float" calculation methodology, and the free float factors of each company in the index. [1]
  2. Then I created a list of all sensex companies in an excel sheet, got all values for their earnings (both last 4Q and last annual), prices, market prices etc. All for the date of April 02, 2007.
  3. I then calculated the weighted market cap, weighted earnings and the market divisor. Using that I could get the appropriate number of Sensex shares, which I then used to find the Sensex EPS and Sensex P/E.
I may be horrendously wrong here - but if you find that my calculation is a problem please let me know. It took me a while to figure out how they had calculated the Sensex P/E and I think I now am close to it.

The results are for you to see:

(View the spreadsheet here)

The reported Sensex P/E was 19.39 on the BSE pages. This is close to my own calculation based on the last reported ANNUAL earnings where I get a P/E of 19.92. The difference is perhaps in the figure I took as earnings (last reported P&L statement) whereas they may have considered a slightly different figure.

But if I consider the last four quarters, I get a P/E figure of 16.37. The last four quarter P/E is about 18% lower than the BSE reported P/E.

What does this mean to you? If you are using the P/E to consider whether a market is overvalued or undervalued (comparing against potential future earnings growth) you may want to use the last four quarter earnings instead. For example if you want the P/E to match earnings growth, 20% growth expection based on a P/E of 19.39 looks overvalued, but what if you considered only 16.37%? Is that still overvalued?

Use the right data. Don't use the Sensex P/E to compare against earnings growth.

Note: The NSE has changed the Nifty P/E calculation since Dec 20, 2004 to reflect last 4Q earnings.

Notes:
[1] The sensex is based on the market cap of the top companies in the BSE. But some companies have a lot more stock held by non promoters than others - Wipro has just 15% available to non-promoters, which ICICI bank has more than 50% - so stock values can be high only due to high demand and low supply. So the BSE weights the individual company market caps by their "free float" - the number of non-promoter shares - and used the weighted market cap instead.

The market caps, suitably weighted by the free float factor, are added up and divided by a figure called the "market cap divisor". This is a calculated figure that ensures that the sensex value is always comparable, and takes into account any changes in the constituent company shares, dividends, bonuses, splits etc. You can always find the current market cap divisor by dividing the weighted market cap by the sensex value.