Vote of confidence? Hardly. Doubtful. It is merely an opportunistic deal, and probably a damn good one, for Berkshire Hathaway (BRK). On the other hand, for Goldman Sachs, it is a very expensive deal. If you delve beneath the headlines, you see that Warren is not so much making a vote of confidence as he is extracting pound of flesh (and then some).Read the whole thing. In effect, Berkshire gets $5 billion worth preferred shares - with a 10% payout on them, which is $500 million a year.
Obviously if Paulson doesn't rescue the banks GS may not have that kind of upside, and this kind of liability might take it down further. Uhm, Buffett kinda expects it: (Via Calculated Risk)
"If I didn't think the government was going to act I wouldn't have done anything," Bufett said Wednesday during a wide-ranging interview with CNBC Television.Not quite the vote of confidence in Goldman Sachs, you'd think. But Buffett is going to need to put more capital in. He has big investments in housing (interiors etc.), financial services, rating agencies and insurance - the future of which aren't looking very good. If he doesn't participate now, there will be other repercussions - especially when some of these industries are going to face severe regulation.
But this is a smart cookie deal. He loses only if the U.S. economy tanks. What are the chances of that? Why don't I hear a loud "NONE"?


Recent Comments