Debt

Sterling Biotech Defaults, Biggest Ever

No Comments » Written on May 18th, 2012 by
Categories: FCCB, STERLINBIO

From Bloomberg (HT Reader Atul Mittal on my original post):

Sterling Biotech Ltd. (SLT), a gelatin maker based in Mumbai, didn’t pay $184 million of convertible notes that matured yesterday, the biggest missed payment by an Indian company on debt that can be swapped for shares.

The company is negotiating a new repayment schedule with investors, according to a person familiar with the matter, who confirmed the non-payment and asked not to be identified because the details are private. Sterling has hired Avista Advisory Associates Pvt. and Houlihan Lokey, a U.S. investment bank, to advise on the restructuring, the person said.

Sterling is the third Indian company to miss a convertible bond repayment this year, after Hotel Leela Venture Ltd. and Murli Industries Ltd., according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Companies in the South Asian nation need to repay a record $5.3 billion of convertible securities in 2012, the data show.

Oh, and the company has even defaulted on local loans: SBI has taken them to court for non-payment.

I wonder what starts now. FDI is pretty much good bye if this situation isn't resolved fast, and the hit to local lenders too will start to hurt. Banks are a dangerous buy right now, but so are anyone who's ever borrowed abroad.

Will Sterling Biotech Default on FCCBs Today?

5 comments Written on May 16th, 2012 by
Categories: FCCB, STERLINBIO, Stocks

Sterling Biotech is in serious trouble. With plunging revenues and a very high debt cost, they're now also going to have to pay back $183M worth Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds (FCCBs).

(Read more about The FCCB problem)

STERLINBIO (the NSE Code) borrowed $250 million in 2007, with a conversion price of Rs. 163.13 till May 2012, at a fixed dollar rate of Rs. 42 to a dollar. Some of this was converted - the graph below shows you the stock stayed above the conversion price till mid 2008 - and some was bought back from the open market (FCCBs trade in markets abroad), after RBI allowed companies to do so at a discount.

image

The stock is at a miserable Rs. 8 today, which basically throws any chances of conversion out the door. Even if it was Rs. 163, it wouldn't be converted, since the dollar rate is fixed at 42 for the conversion - the current dollar rate is Rs. 54 or so; the equivalent break-even rate would be Rs. 205.

In the face of no-conversion, the money has to be returned, with some interest. Nearly $184 million needs to be repaid today (16 May 2012) - a total of 993.6 crore rupees (9.936 billion).

Sterling Biotech hasn't got the money, it seems. Their recent results show a loss of Rs. 92 cr. in just the JFM quarter, with even the December quarter showing losses. Their main business of Gelatin has been seriously impacted by higher effluent discharge anti-pollution norms, and their CoQ10 products have been hammered by cheaper Chinese competition.

The company has huge debt - the debt:equity ratio is now 8:1 compared to about 1:1 in 2007. They have another $670 million worth of loans from local lenders and External Commercial Borrowing (ECB). They've even restructured with local lenders to give them a two year moratorium on both interest and principal, and ECBs are anyway back-loaded so they're probably have a two year headroom.

But the FCCB comes due today and a default is imminent. I don't have any news of an FCCB restructuring and if there is no news today the company will then have defaulted on $184 million. The last big default was Wockhardt, which was half this size (Less than $100m). And Wockhardt might even repay.

I bring your attention to my earlier chart on FCCB redemptions in 2012:
image

Now the $184M is a significant part of that massively stressed portfolio of FCCBs in May, and look further into June and July as the total redemption value shoots even higher. July has a $421 million potential default on FCCBs.

Some of these companies have borrowed from local lenders too. When they default on their FCCBs, the FCCB holders will file a winding-up petition (like Zenith and Wockhardt) and that might result in the local lenders having to restructure as well. Additionally the court delays in completing a pay-up-or-shut-down operation will scare lenders abroad from lending more to Indian companies - a situation that means companies can't borrow abroad (through ECB or such) to repay the FCCBs.

Since India finances its trade deficit through investment flows, a slowdown in investment is the death-knell for the rupee. While we may have written off Sterling Biotech as a gone-case, what its default might trigger is an avalanche.

A 10% Return on FMPs, Tax Free!

17 comments Written on March 13th, 2012 by
Categories: Debt, FixedIncome, MutualFunds

Fixed Maturity Plans (FMPs) are not spoken about much now, but if you’re looking at getting reasonable tax free returns, consider this:

FMPs invest, typically, in debt that matures in the same term as the FMP. A 1 year FMP typically buys whatever matures in a year. It’s March today and the financial year 2011-12 will end on March 31. There are FMPs that are greater than 385 days – meaning they will effectively end in April 2013.

The tax code (even the DTC) says that if you buy something in one financial year and go past two financial years, you can use an indexation benefit to allow the impact of inflation before you pay tax on your returns. The formula is:

Gain = Sell value – Indexed Purchase value

         = Sell value – Purchase Value* (CII for FY of sale)/(CII for FY of purchase)

The idea here is that you

a) buy now = so your CII for year of purchase is the one in FY 2011-12

b) sell in April 2013, so your CII for year of sale is FY 2013-14

(For more, read: How To Calculate Long Term Capital Gains Tax)

Effectively get both the inflation in 2012-13 and 2013-14 to index. Assuming 8% inflation each year, about 16% returns are totally tax free! Of course, you will make only about 10.5% or so, which means you actually can declare a “loss” of about 5% odd, which you can then adjust against other such long term capital gains (assuming that post indexation there are any gains in other non-equity funds/investments you sell).

There are many actual products that you can buy; FMPs are released with very short buy dates. A fund I’ve been told about – Reliance Fixed Horizon Fund XXI Series 18 – which can only be bought between 12th March and 14th March, and invests only in bank CDs. Don’t worry if you miss the date, they’ll be a new one soon. And most mutual funds are good, in this respect (HDFC, Reliance, Axis MF, etc.)

The 10% net of tax return is way better than a fixed deposit at a bank, where the interest is taxable. A 10% bank FD means a 7% net return for a person who is in the 30% bracket – there is no concept of indexation.

Downsides: you can’t exit earlier, you’re locked in for a year. If interest rates go up, you don’t get any advantage. There’s also the risk that yields can change – I’m just telling you the current market yields, these can go up and down on the date of purchase, which can change returns. They don’t typically change, but who knows. Finally, only choose funds that invest in bank CDs that are at the top of the pile – those are least likely to default. Do not choose those that buy Commercial Paper.

Disclosure: I might buy an FMP next week, if money gets really tight after the advance tax payment (it’s a risk, yields could even come down). But I’m finding the going really good on ultra short term funds (10% odd, still tax free for me) and might need the liquidity very soon, so my decision will change.

Also, I am a registered mutual fund advisor – largely for a friends and family network – so you should know that this info might be biased. (I don’t think so but I’ll let you decide). Finally, note that I’m not being paid directly by any of these funds for this post. They might buy into a third party ad service to advertise on this blog but I don’t have any control over that process.

Chart: FCCB Redemptions in 2012

3 comments Written on March 6th, 2012 by
Categories: ChartOfTheDay, FCCB

I’ve written about the upcoming FCCB problem, where a number of FCCB redemptions were coming around about now, and they were all so far under par that they would need to be redeemed, not converted to shares.

Fitch has now released a report that classifies outstanding FCCBs in 2012 by stress levels and I shamelessly scraped it from Deepak Singh’s excellent State Of The Market blog. In 2012, more than $7 billion worth FCCBs come due, and according to Fitch, $1.5 billion worth FCCBs have serious potential for default.

image

In March, of the 217 million that comes due, 138MM was from Subex, which is trying to defer the FCCB over to July 9 (the decision will happen in a bondholder meeting today). But it is still stressed, since the idea of the deferment is to restructure the borrowing.

The Upcoming FCCB Problem

7 comments Written on December 7th, 2011 by
Categories: FCCB

There has been consternation about Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds, or FCCBs recently, and this is a more detailed post on them.

What are FCCBs

An FCCB is basically like this:

Government Debt: A Visual Analysis

2 comments Written on March 23rd, 2010 by
Categories: Debt, Gilts, InterestRates

Our government is going to issue a truckload of bonds next year, so let’s see where we are right now with respect to current bonds outstanding.

Total Bonds Issued: 18,26,501 cr. (18.26 trillion, excludes MSS of 2000 cr.)
Total Interest we will pay next year: 146,610 cr.
Total Taxes Collected (Estimate): 746,651 cr.
Interest paid as a % of taxes: 19.64%.

This is quite high – and the taxes mentioned are gross amounts – net of state sharing, and including certain non tax revenue items like dividend and interest received, the real revenue of the government is just 682,212 cr. – interest being paid out is 21.5% of that!

Let’s then look at how much is maturing in which year:

image

Source: Finmin

Around 106K cr. matures this year, and will have to be paid out. According to the budget speech, we expect an ADDITIONAL net borrowing of 345,010 cr. this year, for the deficit of about 381,000 cr. Add that to the 106,000 cr. maturing, and we end up with a financing requirement of 451,000 cr. 

You might think: Hey – we are borrowing 106,000 cr. to pay back people we had borrowed from earlier? Isn’t that ponzi? Welcome to the world of government financing. And indeed most capital market finance.

Our GDP was 61,64,178 cr. in 2010, and we expect it to grow to around 69,30,000 cr. in 2010-11. That’s an additional 800,000 cr. in GDP that the entire country will do; while there’s no sense comparing incremental government debt to GDP growth figures, it gives you an idea of the scale of government borrowing.

(Note that this looks very good when applied, for instance, to western countries. The US will probably need to borrow $2 trillion. If they do REALLY well, they will grow about GDP by $700 billion.)

Also we’re slightly better off than countries abroad in terms of debt to GDP, but our interest payments are WAY too high. (20% of revenues is not a good thing – the US is at 5-7% and they are getting worried)

So what is the effective interest rate we pay? Overall, our payout is at 8% (considering all maturities). On a maturity year basis:

image

The most expensive debt is maturing in the next two years – at around 9.75%. If we are able to roll this over to say 8% yields, we’ll save about 3,500 cr. in interest on the same amounts. Look then at the distribution (the ultra low figures are floating rate bonds)

image

The size of the bubbles is the amount of debt outstanding. We have a small amount of leftover debt from really long back, at high rates; ignore those. But above 10% you notice a few large bubbles maturing in the next four-five years – those hurt us the most, and we need to roll them over at lower rates. But since the RBI is on an interest rate RAISING cycle, and inflation is already at 10%, it’s going to be a tug of war between RBI’s raising rates and the government balking from paying higher interest when rolling loans over.

A significant chunk of borrowing matures in the 2015-20 timeframe, and I’d imagine we have two choices – either have high inflation and thus devalue this debt to the point where it’s easy to pay back (remember, all this debt is in rupees) or scale to a current account surplus so we don’t need to refinance most of it.

The next year will be tough for the RBI – for controlling inflation and placing government bonds. In an environment where private players are willing to pay more and are now strong, government debt placement will be even more difficult, unless we let foreigners hold our debt. But if we do, that screws up the rupee-dollar equation; like I said, tough year for the RBI. A crisis of any sort, and we have to get back to the drawing table. (If we ever left it)

I presume this will be an ongoing task to keep the outstanding debt profile mapped. I’ll try and make a post every month, keeping a tab of all new issuances, maturities and buy backs.

A equity fund that’s like a debt fund: Arbitrage opportunities

11 comments Written on May 11th, 2007 by
Categories: Debt, Futures, MutualFunds
How would you like to invest in a fund that gives you:
a) better returns than liquid funds
b) same risk as a liquid fund
c) much better tax treatment than a liquid fund

I can see you raising your eyebrows in suspicion. No this is not a get rich quick scheme, and will not loot you of your money.

You should consider buying an arbitrage fund like SBI Arbitrage Opportunities fund.

Reason: It has given around 2.88% in the last three months, which is higher than liquid funds. Second, the risk profile is like that of a liquid fund - i.e. no capital risk at all, since it invests only in arbitrage opportunities.

Third, the capital gains tax on an arbitrage fund is much better than a debt fund - it is only 10% of your gains if you ditch the fund less than a year, and 0% for more than one year. Reason is: This fund invests in equity arbitrage, so it gets the benefit of an equity fund, with the risk profile of a debt fund.

Firstly let me explain the concept of arbitrage in this case. A stock that is traded in the futures markets - let's say Infosys - usually has a slightly different price on the futures market versus the cash market. So if the futures price is Rs. 1975, and the cash market price is Rs. 1950, then you can buy in cash and sell the future. That gives you Rs. 25 per share, risk free - regardless of which direction the price moves.

Say the price on the date of expiry is Rs. 2,400 (huge increase). The future sale will be a loss of Rs. 425 per share, but you also sell in the cash market and make profit of Rs. 450 per share. The result: Rs. 25 profit. If the price is Rs. 1600, you make Rs. 375 profit on the future, Rs. 350 loss in the cash market. Still, Rs. 25 profit. So it's risk free.

That is an example of course; your results may vary. But why can't you do this yourself instead of going to a fund house? Because the margins required to do this are pretty big - buying a 100 lot (minimum lot size for Infy) in the cash market needs about 2 lakhs of cash, and to sell in the futures market requires about half that. So 3 lakhs, to make 25x100 = Rs. 2500 profit. You may not have that kind of capital available.

In the last few months arbitrage funds have made about 9-10% annualised, and the tax benefit allows you to get a better return. If you invest in a liquid fund, it would give you around 9% annualised, purely because dividend tax is high (around 28%) and capital gains tax is around 30% (your investment bracket). Taking 30%, your net return, if you want to exit within a year, is around 6.3%.

Arbitrage funds, being equity funds, allow you to get a better capital gains tax - which is 10% short term, and 0% long term - and that means a 9% return translates to a 7.85% return within a year. (including 0.25% STT)

What's the downside? (There is always a downside)

You can buy this fund anytime but you can redeem or sell it only on the last thursday of the month (futures expiry date). If you give your redemption order before that, you will money only on that date or a couple of days after it. It's not as liquid as a liquid fund, but if, like me, you are ok with getting your money at the end of the month, you should be ok.

There is no entry load. There is an exit load if you exit before six months - typically 0.25% or so. Also there is STT applicable, again, 0.25%. Even if you consider that you make more money with arbitrage funds, with the same low risk, than liquid funds. You sacrifice a little liquidity, and your returns are not guaranteed.

This may even be better than long term FMPs, which give you the above advantages of lower tax since they span financial years, but you have to hold till maturity (or pay a large penalty).

Links: SBI Arbitrage Opportunities fund

Also read Money Today's informative article.

How can FMPs save you tax?

10 comments Written on April 10th, 2007 by
Categories: Debt, FD, IncomeTax, MutualFunds, TaxSaving
FMPs, or Fixed Maturity Plans are quite in vogue nowadays - and they all tell you they're going to save you a lot more tax than bank fixed deposits (FDs). How?

Debt funds are simply those that invest in debt securities - like Govt securities, corporate bonds, corporate rated deposits etc. Fixed Maturity Plans (FMPs) are debt funds that have a fixed term - usually 3 to 6 months, and are closed ended, meaning you can only buy in an NFO, not after that.

Many govt securities are 16-20 years to maturity, and to avoid liquidity issues, these and most others are traded in the debt market.

Debt funds are affected by interest rate risk - when the interest rate goes up, the prices of their current securities go down. After all why would you buy an 8% bond for the same value if you have a 9% bond available. So NAVs can flutter around.

FMP Returns are not guaranteed, but usually indicative returns are reached. Why? Because they buy products at the same maturity level, and hold till maturity. So an FMP now may say indicative returns are 9.5% for a 370 day period, which involves them buying securities yielding 10.5% for the period, and holding till maturity. They charge you about 1% as management fees, so the return to you is 9.5%, pre tax.

(If you're thinking - heck, forget them, I'll invest in the instruments myself, banish the thought. The minimum investment can be in lakhs and crores, and some are only available to corporates.)

Even if the interest rate goes up or down it doesn't change the yield for them (since they don't sell or buy the security). How do they give you lesser tax? Two ways.

1. Double indexation. The gains you make are indexed over two years (typical indexation rates are 5% a year) so that you make no gains according to the tax authorities. That involves buying, say, in March of one year and maturing in April of the next year. (Read about indexation)

That gives you two financial years (since years are April-March) of holding, whihc means a typical indexation of 10%+ - so you make 10% or so on interest, and the goverment thinks you made nothing because of two years of inflation, so you pay no (or very little) tax. See for yourself.

2. Lower tax rate: All longer term debt fund dividends are taxed at (about) 19% versus FD interest being at your marginal rate (say 30%). Note: short term debt that involves money market and call money is charged higher dividend rates. Also, capital gains for debt funds held over a year is only 10% (without indexation) or 20% without.

Both these are significantly less taxing than FDs, where the interest is added to your income and taxed at your marginal rate.

What's wrong with FMPs? Well, the interest rate is not fixed. You never know how much you'll eventually get. Second, there is usually some penalty for early liquidation (before maturity) that can actually erode your capital. If they put a 0.25% early exit load, and you want to exit in say a month, the NAV may not have moved enough to cover the exit load itself, so your capital also goes! This doesn't happen with FDs.

Lastly, long term FMPs are not available anytime you want them. Most FMPs open in the Jan-March time frame for the double indexation benefit. In fact March is like FMP paradise. But come April and the drought begins, which makes no sense for someone who has just got some cash in April.

Also read: Rediff's FAQ about FMPs.