MutualFunds

Dynamic Bond Funds

8 comments Written on February 7th, 2012 by
Categories: MutualFunds

I’ve had two questions on email recently about Dynamic bond funds.

The concept of Dynamic bond funds needs an understanding that bonds are complicated, way more than stocks. A few things that make bonds different:

a) Issuer creditworthiness: Is a government bond more likely to default, or a second rate corporate bond? Would a Reliance bond have a chance of default more than say an ICICI Bank bond? The lower the credibility the higher the interest rate one asks for.

b) Yield: How much interest will I get, on a comparative basis, for this bond versus that one?

Read the rest of this entry »

Jago Investor Action Month, SEBI Regulations on Mutual Funds

4 comments Written on August 24th, 2011 by
Categories: MutualFunds

Jago Investor is running an “action month” where they talk of “pure action”, you commit to taking certain action: buying a term plan, buying health insurance, starting an SIP, organizing your financial life, and surrendering useless policies. Manish will keep in touch and there are prizes from multiple sponsors, such as MProfit (a neat software to manage investments), Moneysights (a fin portal), FundsIndia (buy or sell MFs online).

Disclosure: These are all people I know, and folks I think are doing a great job on the financial internet, so deem me interested. There is nothing in it financially or otherwise from me, other than the goodwill of these awesome people.

What am I going to do? I’ve already got term plans but I’ll buy the next round ditching the current ones next year after premiums go down (they will after the results from the census are incorporated). I’ve got health insurance for the family. I won’t do an SIP because I actively manage my money. I need to reorganize some of my financial life like get out of some very old mutual fund investments or to at least get them online so I can transact when I want (I will do this). And finally, I will not surrender my useless policies because surrender is worse than paying to the end of term for them (I’ve calculated). My actions shouldn’t determine yours – you should take your own decisions.

*****

SEBI has in a new circular, allowed transaction charges of Rs. 100 per transaction for transactions above Rs. 10,000, to be deducted from the transaction itself. For new subscribers, distributors will be paid Rs. 150.

That means for a cheque of Rs. 10,000, only 9,900 will be invested for new investments into new fund schemes, and Rs. 9,850 for existing subscribers of a fund scheme. Distributors can opt-out of this charge entirely for all of their customers (not selectively per customer or per transaction). SIPs will be charged that amount as well, but over 3-4 installments.

FundsIndia has announced that they won’t charge this for any of their customers; I hope others will follow suit. I buy online with HDFC Bank right now, but if they start charging, I will move to FundsIndia or go direct. (Haven’t bothered because I’m lazy)

*****

AMCs have also been asked to deduplicate folios within six months. I wonder how many folios will be shown once deduplicated.

MFs will now have to reveal data by geography (top n cities and so on), and total commissions paid to distributors of Retail/HNI investments greater than 100 cr. AUM raised.

Don’t Buy A 1 year FMP: Taxes Will Apply Under DTC

11 comments Written on August 1st, 2011 by
Categories: FixedIncome, MutualFunds

Fixed Maturity Plans are being touted as the new way to lock yourself into about 10% yields. But Sandeep Shanbhag mentions why the Direct Tax Code screws the FMP buyer.

FMPs are locked in for a period, the biggest that are being sold now are 370 days or so. That is, you get in now, you get out a year later. Since no one else can get in meanwhile, the fund buys 1 year securities (currently at around 10%) and locks in the interest.

Why is this better than a fixed deposit? FD income is taxed as part of your other income, which could be 30% at the highest slab. FMPs, when held for a year, attract both indexation and Long Term Capital Gains Tax. (Read my post on how LTCG is calculated).

Read the rest of this entry »

ELSS Mutual Funds: Early Withdrawal?

3 comments Written on June 27th, 2011 by
Categories: MutualFunds

FundsIndia posted in it's twitter account, that Value Research suggested no-lock-ins for ELSS fund savings if you didn't try to save tax:

If you had not invested in the tax planning funds to save tax, the three-year lock-in does not apply which is mandatory for only those seeking tax deductions by investing in these funds. You can redeem your investments in these two funds whenever you wish.

This is not true. I tried to redeem certain tax-saving funds ahead of time but the application was rejected.

And then, how will the fund know that the applicant didn't try to use it to reduce tax? Will they ask for a tax return? Many tax returns are so convoluted that it takes experts to decode them - so will funds hire a tax analyst?

I doubt this is the case. The tax department won't be happy if ELSS funds (called "tax-saving" funds) are allowing early redemptions; the tax saving is contingent on their not being accessible for three years.

Of course ELSS is being scrapped from next year, so any further argument will be moot.

Update: Value Research has acknowledged the error, both on Twitter and in the comments section, and changed the original post.

In theory, if you make investments in ELSS funds and you later discover that you were not liable to pay tax, then you may redeem your investments within the lock-in period. This would involve getting a certificate to the effect from the tax authority and then approaching the fund for redemption. We are not sure how easy or difficult this may prove in practice and whether the tax authorities and the AMCs have the processes in place to actually do this.

SEBI MF Panel Proposes a Rs. 100 Transaction Charge

10 comments Written on June 7th, 2011 by
Categories: MutualFunds

According to ET, the SEBI Mutual Fund Panel has suggested a transaction charge of Rs. 100 per transaction instead of an entry load:

The committee headed by Prashant Saran , member of the board at the markets regulator, last week nearly concluded that a Rs 100 transaction fee could be imposed on investors for every new investment that will help distributors cover costs

Read the rest of this entry »

At Yahoo: Loaded in Disfavour

No Comments » Written on May 14th, 2011 by
Categories: MutualFunds, Yahoo

At Yahoo, I write on entry loads and my distaste for them at Loaded in Disfavour.

(Reproduced)

"Bring back the entry load" seems to be the cry among distributors and advisors of mutual funds, as the new chairman of SEBI, U.K.Sinha, appoints committees to look into various aspects of the regulator's functioning. Mr. Sinha was the head of UTI Mutual Fund earlier, where he had complained about the SEBI move to remove entry loads altogether in 2009 — the intermediary community now desires that he reverse the earlier SEBI decision. Read the rest of this entry »

RBI: Banks Can’t Invest >10% of Net Worth in Liquid Funds

4 comments Written on May 4th, 2011 by
Categories: Banks, MutualFunds

In the Monetary policy yesterday (see longer post) RBI has said that Banks can't invest more than 10% of their net worth into liquid mutual funds.

ET has some data:

Banks' investment in mutual funds aggregated Rs 1.11 lakh crore on April 6 against Rs 70,999 crore on January 14, according to RBI. Fund managers said over 80% of banks' money in mutual funds is in liquid schemes. The investment restriction will limit banks' surplus money coming into mutual fund schemes at Rs 30,000 crore. The total net worth of the banking system is around Rs 3.13 lakh crore as March 31, according to fund managers.

How Much Goes Out?

So Investment in Liquid funds = approximately 90,000 cr.

Net worth = 3.13 lakh cr. and 10% of that = 31,300 cr.

So 60,000 crore will flow out. When? Not immediately - banks are given six months to ease out the transition.

How much do mutual funds lose?

Assuming liquid funds charge 0.25% as management fees, the total loss will be around 150 crores. This may not sound like much but it is, I think, a reasonable chunk of MF profits.

Why did RBI do this?

Banks would put money into liquid funds which would in turn buy bank Certificates of Deposit, sometimes of the very banks they got the money from. That's circular. And because of it there is a risk that if one bank starts withdrawing a lot of money, it will hurt the liquidity and capital raising ability of other banks (since CDs will be sold and prices fall) which will also start selling their liquid fund holdings and so on.

The other reason banks might happily do this is that if they couldn't really take on exposures of certain corporates beyond a limit, they could buy liquid funds that could in turn buy the same companies' commercial paper.

The overall impact is negative for mutual funds, surely. It's negative for banks in that they need other ways to get the easy 9% they were getting from the mutual fund route. The days of easy spreads are over?

Monthly Income Plans Versus Fixed Deposit

13 comments Written on April 25th, 2011 by
Categories: FixedIncome, MutualFunds

Updated 25 April 2011: Given the popularity of the post I decided to redo the data until today and see how MIPs have fared. It seems that the data I had was off by a little bit (in terms of dividends, but the results don't change too much). I'm reworking the entire post to include data till April 2011.

Mutual funds have monthly income plans – MIPs – that provide a monthly dividend; how do these compare against Fixed Deposits (FDs)?

Risk-Free?

First, note that MIPs are not risk free – they invest a little in equities as a “kicker”. So if you’re looking for ultra risk-free return, this is not it. I’m just looking at it as something that a retiree or semi-retiree can invest in, and doesn’t mind the slight additional equity risk. A lot of people I know would qualify.

Example

Let’s take a 25 lakh investment made in an MIP – HDFC’s Long Term MIP Monthly Dividend plan is what I chose. Compare it with the same amount invested in a Fixed Deposit (FD) yielding 9% (Okay, no one gives 9% a year on FD monthly income, but let me be aggressive).

Taxation: Dividends on MIPs are tax-free; FD Interest is taxable. I’ve assumed a 20% tax. (Note, however, that about 13.6% of dividend distribution tax applies to mutual funds , including surcharge and cess, but this is paid by the mutual fund, not you. It reflects in the NAV.

Nowadays banks deduct 10-20% tax at source for FD interest – so if you get a lower tax rate you have to ask for a refund. That is crazy for someone who’s investing for a monthly income!

Returns: I plotted the four-year graph (assumed started on Jan 1,2007) of the entire return. The line graphs are the return-to-date for MIP and FD (including interest/dividend post tax) and the bars are the monthly income levels.

Monthly Income Plans versus FDs

The return (blue and red lines) are the simple interest on the FD - since we require income, I assume no reinvestment of either the dividend or the FD interest.

The purple and green bars are the cash-flows every month.

Cash flows: The FD interest is constant, as expected (a net yield of 7.2%). The Monthly Income Plan has wayward income but you see the equity kicker give spiky income, but they seem to cap themselves at the lower end to what FDs would give.

The FD income, post tax, is about 15,000 per month, while the MIP dividend which is tax-free anyhow, is about 13,000 per month. However the difference is more than made up by the huge change in

MIPs seem to generate slightly higher income in parts – sorta like getting a bonus every once in a while.

Concept MIP Fixed Deposit
Current Value if Sold 27.65 lakhs 25 lakhs
Total Dividend/Interest Received
(Post Tax)
7.78 lakhs 7.20 lakhs
Total Return 35.43 lakhs 32.20 lakhs

 

Verdict?

The MIP has done well in the last four years - an effective yield of 7.70% versus 7.02% for the FD (this is assuming interest and dividends were not reinvested).

But the last one year has seen a flattening down, because the equity markets haven't done too well and the long term debt market's suffered on account of rising interest rates. Also FD rates are up to 10% now and interest rate slabs have been rejigged so your eventual tax liability with a 25 lakh deposit should be at 10% - that brings the FD return much closer to the MIP.

Liquidity wise: both the FD and MIP are liquid (you can get money out in a few days). The FD carries a penalty for early withdrawals though, and the HDFC MIP has a 1% exit load for the first year.

On the face of it, with the higher risk, the MIP seems like a useful option for someone with a large corpus and wants a higher monthly income. And lesser tax reporting hassles or refund issues.

Considering tightening liquidity in the markets and the fact that I expect equity markets to hurt with rising rates, I would expect the FD to outperform the MIP but only if you are in low interest rate slabs and looking primarily for income. If you are in a higher tax slab, then a short term debt fund is likely to do better (even a short term MIP) If you're okay with keeping your money in for a year and then manually withdrawing money for cash flow each month, you could choose a growth plan and make higher returns because you don't get that 13% dividend distribution tax hit.

Finally, if you're already invested, moving to a different plan has a cost, that the new instrument will have a lock-in, work that out in your calculations before you move.

Note: Other options – tax free bonds that yield around 6.5% to 7.5%, Government 10 year bonds that yield a taxable 7.5% or corporate 10 year debentures that yield 10% or so. Some of these have monthly options too; and may be even better.