Reliance

BP and Reliance = $7.2 billion

3 comments Written on February 22nd, 2011 by
Categories: Reliance, Stocks

BP will pay $7.2 billion to Reliance Industries to take 30% stake in 23 oil and gas blocks, and another $1.8 bn based on performance. This is the second BP deal worldwide, after a $8 bn equity swap with Rosneft in Russia. BP will also set up a 50:50 joint venture for marketing LNG.

This is a good deal for RIL. It was getting flak for not being able to pump in more gas or explore more, and it really hasn't built deepwater capabilities yet. BP can also augment the near-term lack of gas by external supplies and feed into the distribution setup RIL has built which is currently not used much. It's huge for the gas industry in India if the distribution setup takes off - NG is an amazing fuel and if you fix transportation it can change our energy profile.

RIL went up 2% yesterday to 957. But nothing spectacular in terms of volumes, honestly. 555 crores on an expiry week is par for the course. Let's see how the markets react today.

The RELIANCE-SEBI Tussle

2 comments Written on February 13th, 2011 by
Categories: Reliance, Stocks

In 2007, RELIANCE (RIL) sold shares it owned in Reliance Petroleum Limited (RPL) for 223 rupees.

RPL Share Price

The share eventually fell back to 70 in late 2008, and recovered to 130 levels when it was merged with RIL - 1 share of RIL for 16 of RPL, which translates to an RPL price of Rs. 112 (RIL is at 900, and had a 1:1 bonus after the merger). Sadly, at the time the merger price was effectively Rs. 60 per share of RPL or so, which is exactly equal to their IPO price in 2006.

But SEBI has now raised doubts about that November sale by RIL. Because of a futures deal:

RIL had sold 4.1 per cent equity in RPL in the open market in November 2007. However, to ensure the transaction did not hurt market sentiment, RIL first sold RPL in the futures and then the spot market while covering the shares sold in futures.

During the process, RIL generated revenues (sale consideration) of Rs 4,023 crore and its profit from the transaction in the futures segment was estimated at around Rs 500 crore.

Sebi had said that since the company was aware of the sale of equity and sold futures prior to that, it amounted to insider trading. However, the company has maintained that all rules and regulations have been complied with. RIL had also said that its action was driven by “protection” of market sentiment and that the gain was recorded in the company’s balance sheet.

...

Sebi’s stand was that if the sale in futures was to protect market sentiment and not to earn profit, the unintended gain should be deposited with Sebi as a settlement amount. RIL, however, is said to have offered a much lower amount. There have been offers and counter offers, but consent could not be reached.

Let's analyse this "insider trade".

What If RIL had lost money because of the large impact cost of its selling RPL shares? In the horrendously unethical world of Indian broking, any attempt to sell shares by RIL would have resulted in brokers front-running and shorting the stock or the future. (SEBI has taken little or no action in such cases, even when it is blatant, and even FIIs know it happens)

A large one time order would have absolutely destroyed the stock - 4,000 crore in one trade? Not happening.

If they split the trade into multiple days, then it would get reported as a bulk/block deal and the world would know and beat up the RPL share.

The futures trade was really the only way to protect the price. This is not rocket science. If I held a ton of shares of a company I want to exit, I'll use the "sell-future-first" policy. FIIs do this all the time. Domestic mutual funds make a few people rich while doing this. (Let's just say fund manager X wants to sell some stock. If someone, let's call him Mr. Broker, knows about the trade, a good amount of money can be made by shorting the future first. Enough said.)

But there are nuances. First, SEBI says there is "unintended gain". Perhaps they figured that out by seeing the actual impact cost of selling the shares versus the gain in the futures. RIL could have covered the futures at a much lower cost than they did - for instance, if they held on to the future short when the share sale was done announced, the market took the price down much further, and they benefited. So even if they allowed the futures transaction, SEBI could say there were extra profits from the announcement, so give that back.

Why is this illegal? Because RIL is an "insider" when it comes to RPL. In other stocks - where FIIs aren't "insiders" - stocks are sold and futures are shorted exactly like this, and profits are made, and perhaps even legally.

Technically SEBI has a case because insider information is any information that can materially impact the stock price. For instance if RIL had sold the stock when it knew, say, that a part of the refinery was going to fail, that would amount to insider trading - I think most people understand that. But if I'm an insider, and I'm selling some stock, does the knowledge that I'm selling the stock constitute insider information? The lines are murky.

This case is interesting from many perspectives, especially political. With MDA's powerful reach within the government, this case is still being allowed on - this could signal a stance I haven't seen associated with a government under the Congress in a very long time.

Disclosure: I sold RPL just around the same time RIL was selling it, coincidentally. I'm still long some RIL, both through direct ownership and mutual funds.

Reliance Breaking Down? [Technical]

3 comments Written on August 11th, 2010 by
Categories: Reliance

Reliance Industries (RIL) has been continuously going south the last few days and this warrants some attention. This is what Reliance Looks Like:

image

This is quite amazing really – six continuous down days, kissing the lower Bollinger band, way below moving averages, and MACD so negative it’s scary.

There’s a reasonable support at 975 and a one year low at 955 which should act as a secondary support. Right now it needs to bounce off those levels, and there’s talk in the markets of managers exiting because performance isn’t all that great.

I like the stock on a fundamental basis. The folks are huge on oil and energy – whose prices are going up. They have a lot of cash, which again is helping them acquire new technologies and to scale. They have invested in BWA and can be a huge game changer in the next five years. Recent results were very good – Rs. 14.8 EPS versus Rs. 11.55 last year, a 27% growth, in what is the largest company by market cap in India. Even if on a technical basis, this is weak, there’s honestly no long term difference in buying at 970 or 1100; if the projected growth of the company is as strong as I think there is substantially higher value in the stock.

Yet, there’s more to this because RIL is the biggest piece of both the Sensex and Nifty. When have we seen such a breakdown earlier? Take a look:

image

This is June 2008. Then what happened?

image

First, the stock recovered to hit the 20 day MA, and then flattened back for a while till Lehman said goodbye, when it went “crash” again.

The difference is that the last time around volumes peaked around the recovery time at nearly 2x average, and we need to see that happen before you time a recovery, even to retrace to 20 MA, currently around 5% above today’s levels.

Technical charts are useful indicators of sentiment and/or money-flow. In this case, when the market’s near a 2 year high, and RIL is the biggest stock in the indices, there can be no real lack of positive sentiment; it has got to be money flow. But – no bulk or block deals on the NSE in the last 15 days. Turnover averaged 500 cr. a day in the last few days. Delivery volumes were 60% averaged in the last few days – it’s about 48% on 11th, again, nothing substantial to note there.

And, strangely Reliance Puts have a lower implied volatility (the measure of time value) than calls. This is inverted – for a falling stock, it should be the other way around! People are selling Reliance puts at lower values relative to the calls, when the stock’s fallen

image

(Note to Dev questions: I wrote this tool that does option IV charting. It’s part of a software product I’m building.)

And the Reliance future still trades at a premium, and is continuing to do so – though it’s narrowed to 5 points.

image

While this may sound strange – the really strong stocks like Tata motors and ICICI Bank are trading at discounts in the futures market.

It’s altogether difficult to say which direction RIL will go, and because of it, the indices. I think what we should see is – a heavy down volume day, and then a recovery to 20 day moving averages. The support levels are important in that if the heavy volumes hold supports, we should see a rise. If it breaks 955, then we should quite easily see 915 on the stock. Odds wise I’d think of buying a call on the high volume down day, or buying the future at support. Selling calls or buying puts on a breakdown below 955 is the other strategy.

[Yes, that’s a long post to say “I don’t know”, but that’s how trading is – you react, you don’t predict, and you watch.]

Sorry for the highly technical posts. I can explain better using video – that’s what my new startup is about. But let me know if you have specific questions, or comments.

Disclosure: Hedged semi-longish position on RIL.

Reliance (RIL) sells 2675 cr. of Treasury Stock

3 comments Written on January 4th, 2010 by
Categories: Reliance, Stocks

Reliance Industries today sold 2,675 cr. of its own stock at an average price of 1,035 per share, to fund . LiveMint says the money will most likely go to fund the LyondellBasell acquisition ($10-12 billion, or 45-55K cr).

Treasury stock is when a company owns it’s own shares – not usually permitted, but in this case, Reliance got them when it merged with Reliance Petroleum I in 2002 (as opposed to RPL II in 2009). Investors remember that Reliance sold a good chunk of what it owned of the RPL II shares at 214 or so, a few weeks before the big crash in 2008. That shows they knew a little bit of timing. Of course, if the RIL management was that smart, they would have sold the treasury stock too at those rates – when RIL quoted at a bonus adjusted price of Rs. 1650.

It’s tough to read anything into treasury sales. If anything it’s good to have cash, one would think, especially when they have quite a lot of debt in a potentially rising-interest-rate scenario.

Reliance 1:1 Bonus and the Brouhaha

7 comments Written on October 10th, 2009 by
Categories: Reliance
Reliance, after years of ignoring shareholder demands, has finally decided to give that 1:1 bonus. Last year, they quoted large investors as being concerned about the accounting implications, which is why they ditched announcing a bonus. But this apparently didn't exist this year. My personal feeling is they waited so the RPL merger would be complete, and then announced it.

So is the big brouhaha warranted? For most investors it makes ZERO difference. The share price will come down by half, and the number of shares will double, on the announced "ex-date". That means your net worth does not change. With the shares priced lower, it might become more affordable so liquidity *may* increase - but with a company like Reliance which is already hugely liquid, there shouldn't be any impact.

Does it matter to the company? No. Whatever is being distributed as "bonus" shares is simply a recapitalization of reserves. (Read "Of Shares, IPOs And Stock Markets" for background) Reserves are created by accumulation of profit (whatever is left over after paying dividends). For Reliance this is a HUGE amount - since they have been immensely profitable over the years. They can even give a 10:1 bonus and still have reserves left over.

(RIL has over 100K crores - a trillion rupees - in reserves, with only about 2000 cr. as the face value of equity shares. Some of it has complex implications with debt and FCCBs but there is a HECK of a lot left over)

A lot of people think a "bonus" is a good thing. It's no big deal at all, in companies like Reliance, unless they were to do a 1:5 split or something bringing the price below Rs. 500 (then a lot more people get interested, for some reason). It used to be a tax saving scheme but even that's been plugged now. Some say this will increase dividend - but by and large, dividend yield remains constant (so it's more a function of the stock price, not the number of shares outstanding) Reliance is paying Rs. 13 per share dividend this year. Next year, they might not pay more than Rs. 6.5 per share (unless they increase profits a lot), so income remains the same.

The company made Rs. 105 per share last year which, after the bonus issue will be Rs. 52.5 per share; the current share price at Rs. 2100 discounts past earnings 20 times, and I expect a post bonus price of about 1050 to 1100 per share. The word 'bonus' is very positive to hear, but like most things in the financial world, things aren't as great as they sound.

RIL’s Subsidiary Is Bankrupt

1 Comment » Written on June 3rd, 2009 by
Categories: Reliance
BS: RIL's German subsidiary files for insolvency
RIL sources said Trevira saw losses amounting to millions of dollars in 2008, especially after the slump in global demand

Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL), the largest polyester fibre and yarn maker in the world, today said its sick German subsidiary Trevira GmbH has filed for insolvency proceedings with a restructuring plan due to its deep financial crisis.

Trevira has filed an application with the Augsburg Court in the State of Bavaria, Germany for insolvency, RIL informed the stock exchanges today.

RIL had elevated Elke Bauerle, chief restructuring officer for Trevira, as its managing director on May 25. She had joined Trevira from Schultze & Braun, a leading law-firm specialised in restructuring, replacing Hemant Sharma, who was heading the company since RIL’s acquisition in September 2004.

The ¤323-million (approximately Rs 2,170 crore) turnover Trevira, a leading producer of high-end specialised polyester yarn and fibre and a well-known brand in Europe, suffered heavy losses last year due to the slowdown in Europe, especially in the automobile sector.

Trevira supplies 27 per cent of its 120,000-tonne-per-annum production of fibres and filament yarn to the automotive sector and 30 per cent to home textile manufacturers. Rising raw material costs and high spends on energy also affected the performance of the company, said sources.

It looks like some of the overseas acquisitions, like Corus, Jaguar/Land Rover, etc. are not in the best of shape.

Reliance Results: EPS down 11.9%

4 comments Written on January 22nd, 2009 by
Categories: Reliance
Reliance Industries announced results today. Q3 EPS is down 11.9% from 26.7 to 23.5. Revenue down 10% at 3156 cr. Profit sits in at 3501 cr., not directly comparable to Q3 FY08 due to the RPL stake sale that bumped up profits by 4300 cr. EPS has also been impacted by Mukesh Ambani's conversion of 12 crore warrants into shares, for which he's paid a whopping 16,800 cr.

RIL Q3 Profits would've been lower by 1177 cr. if forex calculations reflected AS11, which Reliance has steadfastly refused to follow. That's like 1/3rd the net profit of the quarter. Candidate, surely, to add into the SoS, but I'll wait till tomorrow - after all, results were announced post trading hours so it wouldn't be fair.

Overall, quite disappointing and this must do horrible things to the Nifty EPS. We have been at 228 or so all of 2008, and starting 2009 we are going to see earnings drop - not one estimate I've seen includes that possibility, yet. The times, they are a-changing.

The stock was flat today at 1,135.