Subprime

ABXes going nuts again

2 comments Written on July 11th, 2008 by
Categories: Subprime
The ABX indices seem to be hitting newer and lower lows.

ABX is based on the various tranches of CDOs of subprime mortgage loans (see here for more, and thanks Calculated Risk). Simple funda: if they go down, then the people who hold them are making m2m losses every day.

In my last post in June, I'd seen the 07-2 AAA index at 52; now it's at 43. This means someone is only willing to pay 43 cents for each dollar of a "AAA" loan. The phrase "AAA" has no meaning anymore - it's just Another Asinine Acronym.

Credit losses are now going to mount. My Subprime Phase 3 in end-May talked about why I thought the credit crisis was rearing it's ugly head again: now we're right at the point where it should hit the fan.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, reeling from record losses, are practically insolvent. Lehman looks really unhappy on the charts, down some 60% in the last three months. Financial stocks are hitting the bottoms, and suddenly everyone's running for cover - and they will announce results soon.

In India I can't imagine more carnage. Since May end, we have lost 20% on our indices - in less than 45 days. While we may be in for a bounce - even sellers need to take a break - we can't stay isolated from world events for too long. For instance, if Citi goes down, it may want to get rid of it's stake in public companies in India, like HDFC, where it owns a substantial interest. Lehman does too - look for shareholders named "LB Holdings" etc. on the exchange. The resulting unwinding can trigger another run for us.

How to trade this? React is better. We have already taken most of the hit that was going to impact the market, so we may not be too sensitive to bad news. Still, next time the index falls 10% in three days, there's not much room in there for support so it will fall further. I just hope we hit lower circuit a couple days so that the pain is over in a few days. But if I look at histories of crashes, that just doesn't happen. Slow pain, over weeks and months.

For all practical purposes our major fast pain is over. Now it's slow poison time. Gotta go on a diet.

Ambac, MBIA downgraded; more losses to come

1 Comment » Written on June 8th, 2008 by
Categories: Commentary, Subprime
From Bloomberg:
Citigroup Inc., Merrill Lynch & Co. and UBS AG may post losses of $10 billion on bond insurance after MBIA Inc. and Ambac Financial Group Inc. lost their top credit ratings, Oppenheimer & Co. analyst Meredith Whitney said.

MBIA and Ambac, the world's largest bond insurers, had their AAA ratings cut two levels by Standard & Poor's June 5, which trimmed ratings on more than $1 trillion of securities they guaranteed. The downgrades may limit the so-called monoline insurers' ability to write new policies, putting further pressure on earnings, she wrote today in a note to investors.

This is one of the biggest pieces of bad news to hit the markets, yet no one seems to be bothered!

MBIA and Ambac guarantee phenomenal amounts of muni bonds. The buyers of these bonds buy it on the AAA rating of the insurer rather than the issuer (who aren't given AAA ratings for some obscure reason).

Either S&P and Moodys need to quickly upgrade municipal bonds to AAA or there will be a catastrophe in the muni bond market. Worse, this time the people who are affected are the pension funds, school funds etc. who hold these securities thinking they are AAA - without the AAA they must sell, and chances are that prices are going to be low with so much selling pressure.

Meaning, only people like you and I, in the US, will suffer. Jeezus. I hope there is some salvation and S&P/Moodys decide to quickly upgrade bonds - and if they do, their business is toast. This is the beginning of the end of either the bond insurers (MBIA/Ambac) or the ratings agencies (S&P/Moodys)

Subprime phase 3 is here.

Why Subprime Phase 3

12 comments Written on May 24th, 2008 by
Categories: Commentary, Subprime
Before I start my theory about Subprime Phase 3, I want to clarify one thing. Everything I mention here is a short term opinion on where things are going. That means a) I don't think this situation will spell doom forever, just that we seem to be starting on a crisis and b) by using the word "opinion" I am weaselling out of being wrong by simply stating, "Maybe not also".

So why this drama now? We already have had two bad shocks, is there a need for a third?

Yes, of course. The shocks need to hurt a lot more than they have. I believe the world has done a lot of financial fine-tuning which will hurt a lot when it unwinds.

Return of the home mortgage problem

Some of you will say it never went away. And you will be right. Foreclosures in the US are at record levels, home inventories are at record levels, commercial real estate is in the dumps, and worse, the highest loan resets are coming up in the next two months.

Citi is aggressively selling whatever it can in other countries - India and Germany I have heard of. Freddie Mac is hiding assets so they don't have to disclose real prices - and indeed, there may be no real prices at all, as no one is currently willing to buy. JP Morgan and a number of banks are firing to keep costs at bay.

Asset backed indices are showing signs of crumbling again (but too early to say). As foreclosures and defaults increase, cities and counties are seeing lower tax revenues and one of them, Vallejo filed for bankruptcy recently. More to follow surely.

Note that this is not just subprime. Subprime reflects the quality of borrower's credit, and referred to the lowest strata. Now the crisis is well spread out with even rich people and companies defaulting. This next edition of the crisis will be a "we are all subprime now" edition, to quote a famous blog.

Bank Failures At least 150 banks will fail in the U.S. in the next two years, says Marketwatch. I suppose this is inevitable, as more and more banks get caught in a spiralling mortgage crisis, which has blown up to become a lending crisis in general.

Commercial real estate is down, home prices are down, lending is tightened due to much more stringent checks, savings rate was never much anyway etc. This is a sign for aggressive banks to tone down - but most small banks can't, because their cost of funds is high and they have to leverage big in order to even make costs.

Indian banks too are going to be in trouble. With the moral hazard associated with a 72k cr. bailout of agri-borrowers, which agri-borrower will ever want to pay. They'll say - "My neighbour didn't pay his loan and got away. If I don't pay a couple years, I'll also get away". The resentment in that is extreme and will hit way too many banks.

At the retail end, loans are in bad shape. ICICI recently bundled personal loan and vehicle loan portfolios and sold them - either as ABS or as portfolios to Arcil. Other banks are surely doing the same, and it's very likely that the loans are at extremely low prices due to default rates rising. NPAs are increasing dramatically. Also credit standards have been tightened (try to apply for a home loan today), and fee income has dramatically reduced after the derivatives fiasco. CRR increases have reduced leverage capabilities (only a little, but still). With interest rates likely to increase if inflation stays this way, bond prices that banks hold will reduce, and hit their treasury and trading income. Lending is down, deposit rates are high but where do you put the funds, NPAs are increasing, treasury is hit - something will give, and some banks will show the white flag.

Politics

If what's required is tightening the Congress isn't going to be up for it. They already forced SBI to withdraw a circular that halted agri-equipment credit (the bank was facing 17% defaults, the moral hazard effect). They've balked at increasing fuel prices as it hurts their voter base. They don't want to raise interest rates anymore as again, voters take loans. They won't use the forex reserves to any good. They won't even take a hit on taxes to ease prices. They will ban futures trading even if it does not help anything. They don't want to do anything that might actually help the economy in order to be in a good position for the elections next year.

This is stupid, because in the process they will create a crisis of epic proportions which, if they get re-voted to power, they have to live with. But the lure of another 4 years of power is too much, I guess.

The U.S. is in a similar situation. They won't draw on oil reserves despite this price. They will sign a bill that sues OPEC. (Come on now) They will not reduce subsidies for corn farmers in the ill-framed ethanol policy. (India has a crisis of this sort coming up this year)

The refusal of the powers-that-are to take steps to keep the economy stable will hurt us tremendously.

Oil prices that need to break

We are in the end-game of oil prices. Everyone's predicting it will go up. Everyone's waiting and watching a 10% rise practically every week now! Already, funds in the US have the highest ever allocation to commodities and literally everyone is talking about prices going straight up. $200 in a year, $150 next month and so on.

This is the final build up. Anyone who is short crude oil now is probably hurting like crazy. It's only when the last big short is taken out of business, is when the slide will begin (no downside protection!). That may come when oil is $150, or $200, or wherever, but the question is now at what rate, but when.

But the rise of oil in the interim will precipitate the crisis. As more people get on the platform to "hedge", others will exit stocks and bonds that lose value in a rising inflation, rising interest rate scenario. The crisis will hurt asset prices a lot in the coming few months, which in turn will hurt the crisis. (or help the crisis, depending on how you look at it)

Carry trade unwinding

Earlier this year, the US Dollar briefly went below 100 Yen, a sign of carry trade weakness. (Borrow in yen really cheap, and invest in dollars, which doesn't work if the yen appreciates) Now with an oil crisis and a subprime crisis, the US authorities will have to "appear" like they are doing something, like printing more currency or protecting banks or even trying to lower rates some more or some such.

This will weaken the dollar against the yen. May not be against the Euro because the Euro economies will try to do the same thing. Japan has a different set of problems and can't react like this. Effectively I believe the U.S. dollar will go down against the yen, and destroy whatever is left of the carry trade - and there is far more than you and I are aware of.

Ok. Enough.

That's it for now. These were reasons why I believe there will be a crisis coming up soon, in the next two months.

Now for why I only think one or two months. First, oil is heading down by the end of the year. Second, this crisis will kill a lot of the weak players, and some strong ones, meaning they won't need further protection. Third, most of the political damage will be evident by then, and steps are likely to be taken to reverse them, like India driving the rupee up and so on. This will stem inflation. Then we'll have a period of "nothingness" when nothing seems to happen, some scam may emerge, some financial stuff will make news and then die, and so on. This crisis will hurt much more than the last two, and after it, will keep things down but stable. Sorta like communism - everyone is equally poor.

And in the longer term the U.S. will see a problem of deflation and then rapid inflation - that will be Phase 4 of this crisis. It's a little bit like the 70s, and they will find another Volcker. India is likely to emerge stronger after a few years, unless we have a stupid sort of political coalition again, like with the left parties.

So that's me off the soapbox. I could be absolutely wrong and this may turn out to be the beginning of the biggest economy run ever. In which case, I'm happy to eat my words. (The advantage of writing on the internet is that I can swallow air and say I've eaten my words. Bwahaha.)

Disclosure: Do not trade this in the stock markets. Even if I was 100% right, there is absolutely no way to predict when, at what level, to what level, how etc. So please don't take anything I say and try to take advantage before anything happens. DO NOT predict. React.

Welcome to Subprime Phase 3

1 Comment » Written on May 23rd, 2008 by
Categories: Commentary, Subprime
After Phase 1 of subprime in Aug 2007, and Phase 2 in Feb 2008, we are now going into Phase 3 of the crisis.

I'll explain later about why I think so, because I'm feeling terribly tired today. June-July 2008 should be when it all comes out. Only this time it will not be related only to subprime. This time it will not be related only to the US.

Hints: The usual suspects are oil, inflation and commodities. We have as guerilla warriors US bank further losses from MBS and CDOs, huge foreclosures and loan resets coming up, NPAs in India rising, politics, failure of big-assed companies and banks, and a return of the carry-trade-unwinding.

Coming soon to a theater near you.

ICICI Bank – More On Credit Derivatives

1 Comment » Written on March 9th, 2008 by
Categories: ICICI Bank, Subprime
Chanda Kochhar says a few interesting things in an interview with Mint:
... there are four things that have contributed to the $264 million figure: $69 million credit derivatives losses that have already been provided for by the bank, $20 million provided for in the books or our subsidiaries for similar losses, an estimated $70 million for further erosion in value in January and $100 million for investments by our subsidiaries.
Interesting - they still maintain that they had provided $69 million (350 cr.) earlier, when it seems from their publicly available transcripts that they had only allocated 260-280 cr.

Now they have allocated a further $170 million. That is around 680 cr. which should technically halve their net profit. Will have to wait and see.

Considering that the spreads have dramatically increased since January - a further 10% if not more - chances are they will need at least $100 - $200 million MORE at the end of March. Of course they can choose not to take it - our regulators seem to be fairly lax on this issue - and they can randomly pick a number from the air and throw it at us. Still, if we believe that they're honest, we must see another 400-800 cr., apart from the 680 cr. write down already.

Note: According to this interview, they have $2.2 billion in credit derivatives and $4 billion in credit investments.

What are the underlying securities on the collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) that ICICI bought?

We cannot disclose the names. But as I have said, we have exposure to 65% Indian firms and 35% overseas and all of them are investment grade. They are continuously rated by external global rating agencies.

...

A typical CDO is sold in three tranches according to risk and maturity—low risk, medium risk and high risk. Do you hold the riskiest tranches of the CDO in your books?

About $1.6 billion is credit swaps or credit-linked notes, the lowest risk category. We also have about $600 million collateralized debt obligation. They are of medium risk

Rating agencies aren't much to go by, it seems. They still have AAA on companies like Ambac and MBIA, both of which are pretty much insolvent. The agencies have re-rated a lot of CDOs recently, moving them from AAAs to nearly junk.

Now ICICI has only $600 million in CDOs, which is good - but the term "medium risk" scares me. CDOs are usually structured so that the first 10% or so is high risk, another 5% is medium risk and the rest are "low risk" (called the AAA tranche or the senior tranche). The first 10% that default, are taken by the high risk holder - called the equity tranche - which is typically owned by the loan originators (banks who gave out the loan). The next 5% to default get absorbed by the medium risk or the mezzannine tranche, and the rest is by the seniors.

Now you can say that 65% of companies being Indian, they won't default. (I don't buy that, but still) They have about 35% non Indian companies out there, with a global recession. It will take just 15%-20% defaults on the entire CDO to wipe out the mezzannine tranche.

In general 15%-20% defaults are way off the mark. But in today's recessionary state the risk is much higher; this is indicated in the market spreads, which is why there are MTM losses. The point is: If there were no MTM losses, the bank would have held the credit risk and it would remain "unknown" - and suddenly out of the blue, we could see $600 million loss because the CDO tranche went bust. Would you rather have that, or work with market to grade the investment according to the prices other people are paying, so you always have an idea where you stand? I would choose the latter any day, regardless of whether the intention of ICICI is to hold to maturity or not.

Swaps and notes are also impacted with failures when the senior tranches are hit. Regardless of whether the "hit" is caused by an Indian or foreign company.

Lastly, Indian companies are not immune from the global recession. It is likely the debt that ICICI has taken on through derivatives has no recourse to the Indian company - for instance, Corus can take on debt where if it defaults, lenders can't go ask Tata Steel to pay. Meaning, even sound Indian corporates can default abroad and still be sound Indian corporates.

Some more bad news, potentially: ICICI supposedly has a yen denominated loan taken in September, of $1.5 billion. The yen has gone from 114 to the dollar, down to 102, while the dollar/rupee has remained constant (actually rupee has gone a little down against the dollar). The nearly 10% change is to ICICI's disadvantage - an impact of nearly 650 cr. on the capital. I don't know if they actually have this loan right now, and if they hedged the currency risk - but this is something to look out for.

I don't want to sound so bearish that people overreact. Do not do crazy things like removing your fixed deposits from ICICI Bank. They are not in a position of insolvency. Of course, there could be other news that is dangerous, but this derivative writedown is not going to kill them, and you should not panic. As shareholders you have reason for concern, especially in a globally tough scenario. I am definitely not long ICICI - their growth is way too slow for their P/E - but I am not yet short. I would be short if a) there is more bad news and b) price actually goes up from here to cross 1000.

Disclosure: No positions. I had a small short position on ICICI futures initiated and closed on Friday itself. Too volatile to trade.

ICICI’s Disclosure See-Saws: Openly Making Fools Of Us

8 comments Written on March 5th, 2008 by
Categories: Commentary, ICICI Bank, Subprime
Statements from ICICI:
  • Sep 2007: "..treasury income was Rs. 1.75 billion which was a decline over last year Q2 of Rs. 2.4 billion, a 27% decline that was mainly because of the mark-to-market impact on our credit derivative portfolio which was about Rs. 1.00 billion that we have taken at September 30th."
  • Jan 2008: "treasury income for the [Q3] quarter of Rs. 2.82 billion is net of mark to market impact on our credit derivative portfolio of Rs.1.50 billion during the December 31 quarter, in addition to about Rs.1.20 billion that we have provided in September quarter.
  • March 2008: "As of January 31, 2008, the mark-to-market negative on this portfolio due to movement of credit spreads was about $155 million [Rs. 600 cr.] of which $88 million [Rs. 350 cr.] had been provided for in the financial statements of the bank for nine months ended December 31, 2007"
So in September they said 100 cr (1 billion). Then in Jan they said 160 cr. plus 120 we did in September. Where did the additional 20 cr. suddenly popup from?

Still, that's 260 cr. Now they're saying 350 cr. already done - hello? What is this? We are being lied to - or someone is picking up numbers from the air.

Still, the real losses are more no? About 1000 cr. Where's the remaining? Supposedly it's "investment losses" that we shouldn't care about. Uhm, sorry but we do care. Any "investment loss" is still a loss, and regardless of what you classify it under, you have LOST THE MONEY.

They have said, "the bank and its overseas banking subsidiaries have fixed income investments, whose marked-to-market losses are $108 million as on January 31, 2008. Of this, $101 million has been accounted for in the financial statement for the December quarter.".

Where is this mentioned? Nothing has been specifically mentioned about this either in the conference call or in the results. Now they say it has been accounted - I don't believe them one bit.

They also say there is some CDO exposure and then quickly say the underlying are Indian companies. CDOs are made out of a pool of loans and I don't think they have made a pool of ONLY Indian Company loans (if this is wrong, please reveal it ICICI). Mainly because the pool will have 10s to 100s of loans bunched together. That means any CDO investment will have SOME exposure to non Indian companies, and even if you think India is God's favourite country and no company in it will default, it leaves ICICI exposed to some potential default. The market obviously understands this and has priced it that way, hence the mark-to-market losses.

We need a far bigger disclosure. What are these mark-to-market investments, and if CDOs what are the underlying? How much is the real number, and please get this audited because I for one do not believe your figures, they seem to randomly change every few months!

This could be another Enron in the making, folks. Watch out.

The First Real Subprime Loss: ICICI Bank Gets Hit

4 comments Written on March 4th, 2008 by
Categories: ICICI Bank, Subprime
So it seems ICICI Bank has around 1000 cr. ($260 million) of losses due to US subprime.
ICICI Bank Ltd., India's second- largest bank, had a marked-to-market loss of $264 million as of Jan. 31 on account of exposure to credit derivatives and investments, a minister said.

Following the subprime crisis overseas, ICICI Bank's overseas operations had reported'' the marked-to-market loss, Junior Finance Minister Pawan Kumar Bansal said in a written reply to a question in parliament.

I'd written about this in January, but was surprised to see no news coming in since then. Next in line is SBI, I wonder what the hit there is.

The U.S. situation – Bullishness Where There’s Only Bull

3 comments Written on February 26th, 2008 by
Categories: Commentary, Subprime
U.S. home foreclosures are up 90% in Jan 2008.
Defaults among subprime borrowers and those unable to meet rising payments on adjustable-rate loans drove foreclosure filings to the highest since August and the second-highest since RealtyTrac started keeping records. About $460 billion of adjustable mortgages are scheduled to reset this year, raising minimum payments for borrowers, according to New York-based analysts at Citigroup Inc.
[Emphasis mine]

The ABX indices are at their lowest.

MBIA has been let off by S&P, who let them keep AAA - but how? They are in no position to make good on any obligations. Anyways, MBIA is not planning to write mortgage insurance for the next 6 months (who will buy from them anyhow?). They're also planning to split their mortgage and munibond insurance businesses over the next few years.

Ambac is still on negative watch and unless they raise significant capital they're going down, it seems.

Yet, both stocks were hugely up yesterday! The market discounts the immediate future, which seems positive (not yet downgraded) versus the real future which is "bust" for these guys, at least the way they are today.

And in India we couldn't care less. A budget is on the way this week, and the stock markets are low volume and buoyant. Not a good sign this, but it's interesting that the very same factors that were involved a month ago are still existing today, more so than in Jan, and yet, we're looking positive.

If FIIs start another round of selling, we're going to see another big round of damage. Until then we may have a good session going up - but since I won't bet on it, I won't trade it. Waiting for some really good news now - it's been a while!